Feb 23, 2024 NR 439 Week 6 Assignment, Research Article Critique Final Paper
NR 439 Week 6 Assignment, Research Article Critique Final Paper
NR 439 Week 6 Assignment, Research Article Critique Final Paper
A couple of things here:
First, I encourage you to post your discussion answer ASAP because this is a tough concept and the earlier you post, the more you will benefit from my feedback.
Second, This week’s discussion is FOUR questions:
The first is : “Describe a significant nursing clinical issue, topic of interest, or practice problem that is important to you. Describe why you chose the problem/topic.”
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 439 Week 6 Assignment, Research Article Critique Final Paper done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
First of all, it has to be a NURSING issue. Not only a nursing issue, but something that a staff nurse can do independently. Staffing issues require administration involvement, so those would not be appropriate. The efficacy of one drug vs. another is not appropriate because the nurse does not order the medication. Using an order bundle is not appropriate because the nurse doesn’t write the orders.
Second, I STRONGLY urge you to review the Week 3 PICOT assignment before you post in this discussion. That assignment requires you to pick a topic related to quality or safety, and it gives several examples. If you use one of those topics for your Week 2 discussion, you can use it again for the Week 3 assignment. Why re-invent the wheel? However, be aware – the topic you choose can be from the list, but the intervention within that topic needs to be an independent nursing function. For instance, the topic of SSI’s is fine, but an intervention of administering pre-op antibiotics is not appropriate because it is the physician who orders them, not the nurse.
The second question is:
“Write your clinical question in the PICO(T) format for your nursing practice problem.”
This means that you have to write the question out in question format. Make sure you follow the NR439_Guide for writing PICOT Questions and Examples. You actually have to put the PICOT letter into the question!
The third question is:
“List each of your PICOT elements.” This means to write them like this:
P:
I:
C:
O:
T:
Again, make sure you follow the NR439_Guide for writing PICOT Questions and Examples. Also, remember that outcomes have to be specific and measurable. “Fewer patient problems” is neither specific nor measurable.
Finally, the fourth question asks you to:
“Share why you care about this nursing practice problem and why you believe the problem would benefit from finding the best evidence.”
This may seem very similar to the first question, and part of it seems redundant. However, while the first question asks to describe why you chose it on a personal level, this question asks you to describe why you care about this nursing practice problem in general. For instance, you might say that you chose a particular issue because it seems like the problem has increased on your unit (personal). Why you care about this issue might include morbidity and mortality issues, financial reimbursement, research that has been proven to improve outcomes that you are not currently using, etc. Don’t forget to say why you believe the problem would benefit from finding the best evidence. How might that evidence improve the outcomes?
I hope this helps to clarify not only this discussion but also the Week 3 assignment!
NR 439 Week 6 Assignment, Research Article Critique Final Paper
Research Question
Research Design
Sample
Data Collection Methods
Limitations
Findings
Summary
References
Participation: RN-to-BSN
In discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
1. Attendance
Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.
2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions
PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:
Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
Integrate scholarly resources
Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 439 Week 6 Assignment, Research Article Critique Final Paper
Participation points: It is expected that you will meet the minimum participation requirement described above. If not:
You will receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if your response to the initial question is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
You will also receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if you do not post at least three (3) times in each thread on at least two (2) separate days.
3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
NR 439 Week 6 Assignment, Research Article Critique Final Paper
4. Participation Guidelines
You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.
5. Grading Rubric
Discussion Criteria
A
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of performance
B
(87%)
Very good or high level of performance
C
(76%)
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
F
(0)
Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.
16 points
Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.16 points
Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.14 points
Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.12 points
Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).0 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.*
( APA format not required)
12 points
Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:
assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND
at least one outside scholarly source.***
Sources are credited.*
12 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion from:
assigned readings OR online lesson.
Sources are credited.*
10 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson.Sources are credited.*
9 points
Does not integrate any evidence.0 points
Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.
14 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.14 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.12 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.10 points
No response post to another student or instructor.0 points
Communicates in a professional manner.
8 points
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).8 points
Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).7 points
Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).6 points
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).0 points
PARTICIPATION:
Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by
Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
0 points lost
Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.
-5 points
Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.
PARTICIPATION
Total posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.
0 points lost
Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.
-5 points
Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.
NOTES:
* Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.
** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
*** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.
NOTE: A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
