Reflective Journal

Directions: Read the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistic Appropriate Services from the Department of Health and Human Services (2001) located in the readings and resources of this module. Select one of the standards and respond to the questions below. Please use headings. This Reflective Journal does not need to be in the APA template or format, but if you choose to do so, it must be correct.

Why this is important to practice this standard?
Will it likely decrease conflict within cultures?
Why this would have a positive impact on the community?
Why this is important to healthcare providers who work in a diverse facility?
Submission: Submit your assignment in the submit button.

Grading: This journal entry is worth 100 points and will be graded using the Reflective Journal rubric. Use the information in the rubric as a guide toward the successful completion of this entry.

Rubric
Reflective Rubric
Reflective Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
34 pts
Expert
Has a clear and perceptive thesis that is fully supported with specific, relevant examples and contains no generalizations. All required elements are fully addressed, easily identified, and integrated into the project at the highest level.
25 pts
Competent
Has a clear thesis that is supported with many specific, relevant examples, but may have a few generalizations. All required elements are fully addressed, but not easily identified, or thoroughly covered.
20 pts
Developing
Has a clear thesis that is supported with some specific details, but contains some generalizations. Most required elements are addressed, but some are omitted or need further elaboration.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Has no thesis and has inadequate or irrelevant support.
34 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
33 pts
Expert
Demonstrates a clear and insightful progression of ideas; transitions are seamless and skillful; has an organic and sophisticated structure.
25 pts
Competent
Demonstrates a clear progression of ideas; transitions are seffective; has an effective structure.
20 pts
Developing
Demonstrates some progression of ideas, but not clearly; transitions are adequate; has an adequate structure.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Lacks progression of ideas; transitions are nonexistent or inaccurate; has no discernible structure.
33 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage and Conventions
33 pts
Expert
Language choices are fresh and innovative. Sentences are skillfully worded. Sentence structure is both varied and sophisticated. Errors in grammar, mechanics, spelling, and word choice are insignificant.
25 pts
Competent
Language choices are appropriate and accurate. Sentences are generally clearly worded though there may be errors with syntax or omissions; these minor errors do not interfere with readability. Sentence structure is varied. Some grammatical, spelling and word choice errors are evident, but do not interfere with readability.
20 pts
Developing
Language choices are adequate; occasional errors in diction or usage may interfere with meaning. Tone shows some awareness of audience and purpose though some choices may be inappropriate for the writing task.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Little or no resemblance to college-level writing.
33 pts
Total Points: 100

Please read document and put in paper

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH Nursing League TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT