Feb 23, 2024 NURS 6052 Assignment Appraisal of Research
NURS 6052 Assignment Appraisal of Research
NURS 6052 Assignment Appraisal of Research
Identifying the Phenomenon
The article by Rankin et al., (2018) was selected for this assignment. The research focused on human experiences within a natural setting. The phenomenon was the barriers and facilitators to taking self-management of diabetes in pre-adolescent children suffering from diabetes type 1. The researchers conducted interviews in the doctor’s office where the participants were encouraged to share their experiences related to self-management tasks related to diabetes type 1. The study was conducted in the natural setting of the participants in that data was obtained in their usual environment. There was also the use of simulations such as drawing to increase the depth of the information that was obtained in the study.
The phenomenon under investigation in the research by Rankin et al., (2018) is relevant to nursing. It explores the patient-related factors that influence the utilization of self-care tasks in the management of diabetes. It also provides insights into the barriers and enablers to the use of self-care tasks by pre-adolescents for the management of diabetes. The information from the article enables nurses and other healthcare providers to identify effective interventions that can enhance the utilization of self-care management techniques in pre-adolescents with diabetes.
Structuring the Study
The research by Rankin et al., (2018) did not explicitly state the research question. However, it can be inferred from the aim of the research to have been; what are the barriers and facilitators to taking on diabetes self-management tasks in pre-adolescent children with type 1 diabetes? It can be seen from this question that the researchers specified the distinct process that was under investigation. They identified the focus of the study to be on the perceived barriers and facilitators by the participants. The study also identified the context of the research. It can be seen from the research question that the study targeted pre-adolescents with diabetes mellitus type 1. It also identified the nature of tasks that the target population are expected to engage in the management of diabetes mellitus type 1. Accordingly, the researchers were interested in the self-management tasks for diabetes mellitus type 1. The choice of qualitative method that was utilized in the selected study fitted with the research question. As seen in the study by Rankin et al., (2018), its main aim was to identify barriers and facilitators to self-management tasks for diabetes type 1 in pre-adolescents. The barriers and facilitators could only be identified through unstructured interviews that enabled the participants to express their experiences in detail. The approach to data analysis such as inductive, thematic approach was also appropriate due to its ability to provide a generalized view of the experiences of the participants.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 6052 Assignment Appraisal of Research done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Researchers Perspectives and Sample Selection
The biases of the researchers were reported. They included the use of a homogenous sample and small sample size. The researchers concluded that these factors are likely to influence the reliability, generalizability, and dependability of the reported findings. The researchers also provided structure of ideas that reflected their beliefs. For example, they expressed the fact that the incorporation of health information technologies into self-management tasks would address some of the barriers that were identified in the research. It can also be seen in the study that the sample selection utilized by the researchers lives in the phenomenon of interest. The participants were selected based on an inclusion criterion, which included being on treatment due to diabetes mellitus type 1 and willingness to participate in the research.
Data Collection
The methods of data collection that were utilized in the study by Rankin et al., (2018) were stated clearly. They included the use of unstructured interviews where participatory activities were utilized to prompt discussions. The interviews lasted for an average of 45 minutes and were digitally recorded and transcribed in entirety. There is the evidence that participant consent was an integral part of the data collection process. The parents or guardians and pre-adolescents were given consent forms to demonstrate their voluntary participation in the research.
Data Analysis
The dimensions of data analysis that were utilized in the research by Rankin et al., (2018) can be identified and followed logically. They included data analysis by two analysts, independent data analysis that was followed by joint discussions, development of a coding framework, and thematic analysis using NVIVO software. The researchers painted a clear picture of the participants’ reality. They used direct quotations of their descriptions to increase the readers’ understanding of these experiences. The interpretation of the researchers also captured the meaning of the participants. They utilized the data to come up with shared meanings by the participants concerning their subjective barriers and facilitators on self-management tasks in diabetes. The interpretation of the interpretation of the researchers was however not confirmed by other professionals.
Describing the Findings
The researchers provided an explicit analysis of their findings. They provided themes that represented the shared meanings of the participants’ experiences. They also gave examples of the direct quotations of the participants’ narratives about their experiences. They also compared the different subjective experiences to increase the understanding of the readers concerning the experiences. The researchers linked their findings to existing literature. There was an extensive analysis of the similarities and differences in the findings in the study and those reported by other scholars. This analysis provided insights into areas of further research on the topic.
References
Rankin, D., Harden, J., Barnard, K., Bath, L., Noyes, K., Stephen, J., & Lawton, J. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to taking on diabetes self-management tasks in pre-adolescent children with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. BMC endocrine disorders, 18(1), 1-9.
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: NURS 6052 Assignment Appraisal of Research
Week 7 Assignment
Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.
Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.
In this Assignment, you will use appraisal tools to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tools document provided in the Resources.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include:
An evaluation table
A levels of evidence table
An outcomes synthesis table
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
