Feb 23, 2024 Post a Description Of The National Healthcare Issue
Post a Description Of The National Healthcare Issue
Post a Description Of The National Healthcare Issue
There are emergence of different technologies that are often used to facilitate healthcare processes. Today, healthcare processes rely on technology to ensure that there is effective outcomes or quality delivery of healthcare. With the increase in the number of patients caused by upsurge in the rates if infections, more patients require mobile or other digital devices that can be applied in identifying potential healthcare providers. Mobile healthcare technology is increasingly becoming common in the United States (Matthew-Maich et al., 2016). The technology has been developed to save healthcare costs. Mobile healthcare technology is mostly beneficial to the individuals in rural areas that often do not have access to healthcare facilities and providers. The incorporation of mobile health technology in the healthcare processes has facilitated public health activities and effective delivery of healthcare processes for different populations.
Practice-Related: Post-Treatment Activities
Post-treatment activities is one of the practice-need that can be addresses through the use of mobile health technology. With the mobile healthcare technology, patients will be able to obtain post-treatment activities effectively. Post-treatment activities may include addiction education and counselling, learning and practicing coping skills, support group attendance, as well as implementing new healthy behaviors. The application of mobile healthcare technology can be used to address the above activities, a scenario that will enhance effective health outcomes. There has been a lot of problems associated with the post-treatment activities particularly in the rehabilitation centers. In most cases, lack of effective post-treatment activities often makes patients fall back into their self-destructive habits or behaviors. The use of mobile healthcare technology will provide clients with the ability to do extra work on themselves that may be left uncompleted from the primary treatment processes.
Portable Biomedical Equipment
Portable biomedical equipment can be applied in the management of post-treatment activities in the healthcare processes (Yang et al., 2017). Portable biomedical equipment is necessary in ensuring that patients can reach healthcare professionals at any given time and location. Portable biomedical equipment can be applied in the management of daily life stressors that results from the treatment processes such as surgeries. With this equipment patients can easily connect with their healthcare providers and obtain counselling on how to cope with different health conditions after treatment or after being released from the healthcare facilities. The technology can also be applied to implement new healthy routines to avoid further complications.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Post a Description Of The National Healthcare Issue done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Benefits of Portable Biomedical Equipment
One of the benefits of portable biomedical equipment is that it reduces cost in healthcare delivery processes. With the reduced cost many people are able to access post treatment activities away from the healthcare institutions. Another benefit is that it is flexible and can be easily applied by different patients. The flexibility makes portable biomedical equipment more common in different areas, this can enhance the effective and efficiency in the delivery of post-treatment activities to different people. Finally, the technology is more accurate and reliable in different areas, rural and urban areas. The benefits can impact post treatment activities through the provision of enough strategies on how to handle different patients who are far away or those in need of extra healthcare services but cannot be admitted into healthcare facilities.
Barriers to Portable Biomedical Equipment
One of the potential barriers to the use of mobile healthcare technology is high cost; the device is costly and only a few people can afford it. The high cost associated with the device can delay the delivery of post treatment services to the patients, a scenario that can interfere with the general quality of healthcare services. Also, the complexity may render it useless for some people. Portable Biomedical Equipment’s complexity can limit the kinds of port treatment services offered to the patients, a scenario that can lead to the ineffective care services. Finally, language barrier is a challenge that may be associated with the use of mobile healthcare technology (Hsiao & Tang, 2018). Language barriers may delay the post-treatment activities between the patients and the healthcare providers. The barriers may also interfere with the quality healthcare processes for the patients.
Implications for Nursing Practice
The mobile healthcare technology, Portable biomedical equipment, has the capability of enhancing nursing practices. The application of this technology may enhance nurse’s roles in the healthcare delivery processes. The technology may also enhance communication processes between the patients are healthcare providers, this may lead to the quality healthcare delivery to the patients. Finally, mobile healthcare technology can improve nurse, patient relationship, a scenario that can lead to the significant improvements in the healthcare practices. Health literacy and patient education can provide effective integration processes for the mobile healthcare technology. In other words, patient education and health literacy can provide the best skills and knowledge needed in the adoption of mobile healthcare technology identified above.
References
Hsiao, C. H., & Tang, K. Y. (2018). Examining a model of mobile healthcare technology acceptance by the elderly in Taiwan. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 18(4), 292-311. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1097198X.2015.1108099
Matthew-Maich, N., Harris, L., Ploeg, J., Markle-Reid, M., Valaitis, R., Ibrahim, S., … & Isaacs, S. (2016). Designing, implementing, and evaluating mobile health technologies for managing chronic conditions in older adults: a scoping review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2), e29. Retrieved from: https://mhealth.jmir.org/2016/2/e29
Yang, J., Chen, B., Zhou, J., & Lv, Z. (2017). A low-power and portable biomedical device for respiratory monitoring with a stable power source. Sensors, 15(8), 19618-19632. Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/15/8/19618
Reducing Stress on Healthcare
According to the ANA The balance of safety and efficacy and the perception of personal risk versus overall benefit are at the core of acceptability of immunization practices. The known and potential benefits of a COVID-19 vaccine must outweigh the known and potential risks. ANA strongly recommends that registered nurses be vaccinated against COVID-19. All health care personnel (HCP), including registered nurses (RNs), should be vaccinated according to current recommendations for immunization of HCP by the CDC and Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC). ANA also believes that it is imperative for everyone to receive immunizations for vaccine-preventable diseases as vaccines are critical to infectious disease control and prevention. Moreover, nurses have a professional and ethical obligation to model the same health care standards they prescribe to their patients. There is now significant clinical evidence on the safety and effectiveness with approved COVID-19 vaccines being administered under the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization process.
Annals of Internal Medicine stated We need to be more aggressive about respiratory hygiene and placing restrictions on patients, visitors, and health care workers with even mild symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection. Potential policies to consider include the following: 1) screening all visitors for any respiratory symptoms that may be related to a virus, including fever, myalgias, pharyngitis, rhinorrhea, and cough, and excluding them from visiting until they are better; 2) restricting health care workers from working if they have any upper respiratory tract symptoms, even in the absence of fever; and 3) screening all patients, testing for all respiratory viruses (including SARS-CoV-2) in those with positive screening results regardless of illness severity, and using precautions (single rooms, contact precautions, droplet precautions, and eye protection) for patients with respiratory syndromes for the duration of their symptoms regardless of viral test results. A collateral benefit is that if a patient is subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19, staff who used these precautions will be considered minimally exposed and will be able to continue working.
Conclusion
Laureate education (2015) states, that one thing that individuals and leaders can do to be prepared for healthcare challenges of the future is to develop cultural competency, gain skills to view multiple perspectives, and develop greater understanding the survival side of any healthcare organization. Having Beyond the immediate needs in responding to COVID-19, the pulse survey documents hospitals’ perspectives about longer-term opportunities for improvement to address challenges that existed before, and were exacerbated by, the pandemic. These include reducing disparities in access to health care and in health outcomes; building and maintaining a more robust health care workforce; and strengthening the resiliency of our health care system to respond to pandemics and other public health emergencies and disasters.
References
ANA Board of Directors September 2020 www.NursingWorld.org/COVID19Vaccines/
Annals of Internal Medicine https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-0751
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Daily updates of totals by week and state. Retrieved June 2, 2020 from, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm
Vahedian-Azimi, A., Hajiesmaeili, M., Kangasniemi, M., Fornes-Vives, J., Hunsucker, R. L., Rahimibashar, F., … Miller, A. C. (2017). Effects of Stress on Critical Care Nurses: A National Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 34(4), 311–322. doi: 10.1177/0885066617696853
If you asked ten people what they believe is the most pressing issue confronting healthcare today, you might get ten different responses. Costs increasing? Regulation? What is a technological disruption?
These and numerous other issues are debatable. Not surprisingly, much has been said about these topics in research, within the profession, and in the news. Whether it’s a matter of finance, quality, workload, or outcomes, there’s no shortage of changes that need to be made.
In this Discussion, you examine a national healthcare issue and consider how that issue may impact your work setting. You also analyze how your organization has responded to this issue.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and select one current national healthcare issue/stressor to focus on.
Reflect on the current national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and think about how this issue/stressor may be addressed in your work setting.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Then, describe how your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who chose a different national healthcare issue/stressor than you selected. Explain how their chosen national healthcare issue/stressor may also impact your work setting and what (if anything) is being done to address the national healthcare issue/stressor.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 1 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 1 Discussion
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Discussion: Review of Current Healthcare Issues NURS 6053
RE: Discussion – Week 1 Main Post
Collapse
I work in the mental health field, so I decided to bring up the issue of access to mental health treatment. There are over 60 million Americans who suffer from a mental illness and more than half cannot find mental health treatment (National Alliance on Mental Illness, n.d.). There are multiple barriers for accessing mental health treatment and they include lack of insurance, high costs, little options for those who live in rural areas, long waits to get into treatment, not knowing where to find help, social stigma, limited mental health providers and transportation to get to appointments (National Council for Behavioral Health, 2020).
I work for Sacred Heart Hospital in downtown Spokane, Washington and this hospital has done numerous things to help people seeking mental health treatment get through the barriers.
The hospital has a designated psychiatric department in their emergency department than has the capacity for 25 patients. The department is open 24 hours every day of the week. The patient can either walk-in or some are brought in involuntarily by paramedics or police officers. The hospital accepts patients regardless of ability to pay. The patient has access to a social worker to help them with payments or to enroll in medical insurance. The patient’s in the psychiatric ED are seen by a mental health profession to determine if they are safe to leave, need outpatient services, need an inpatient bed at our hospital if available or to refer them to an inpatient treatment facility out in the community.
The mental health professional takes a history of the patient and determine ability to pay, reliable transportation, living conditions, and their support system to determine what kind of help the patient needs. Some patient is detained involuntarily and sent to the state hospital. The hospital does have an inpatient unit for 27 patients. The patients are assessed for barriers to treatment by a social worker and most of these problems are resolved. The social worker helps the patients enroll in medical insurance if needed and locating services near their homes. The social worker also identifies the patient’s support systems to help when they leave the hospital.
Sacred Heart has partnered with Frontier Behavior Health in Spokane that offers inpatient and outpatient psychiatric treatment. Frontier Behavior Health also has a specialty team to do outreach in the community. This team is called Program for Assertive Community Treatment (PACT). This program helps with severe symptoms bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic conditions by going to them in the community (Frontier Behavior Health, 2020). The team helps those 18 years or older to keep mental health appointments, make sure they take their medications, and help the individual to find safe housing (Frontier Behavioral Health, 2020).
As of today, Sacred Heart hospital has no plans to extend their mental health services.
References
Frontier Behavioral Health. (2020). Program for Assertive Community Treatment (PACT).
Retrieved from: https://fbhwa.org/programs/adult-services/program-for-assertive-community-
treatment-pact
National Alliance on Mental Illness. (n.d). The Doctor is Out. Retrieved from:
https://www.nami.org/Support-Education/Publications-Reports/Public-Policy-Reports/The-
Doctor-is-Out
National Council for Behavioral Health. (2020). New Study Reveals Lack of Access as Root
Cause for Mental Health Crisis in America. Retrieved from:
https://www.thenationalcouncil.org/press-releases/new-study-reveals-lack-of-access-as-root-
Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Main Posting
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
