Feb 23, 2024 HCA 205 Week 5 Discussion 1 PPACA and Your Take-Away
HCA 205 Week 5 Discussion 1 PPACA and Your Take-Away
HCA 205 Week 5 Discussion 1 PPACA and Your Take-Away
According to the article” Neatly 20 Million Have Gained Health Insurance Since 2010″, Nicholas Bakalar, the author, says that the goal of the PPACA was to make health insurance coverage accessible for the U.S. Citizens and protect them from expensive or restricted care imposed by insurance companies.
Part I:
The three keys elements of the act that I believe will be the most positive for the country are:
More people have health insurance
Many people can agree with me that when you are sick, you feel like your world is stopping because it becomes difficult for you to do things that you usually do without even thinking, like for example, walking or talking. I remember when I first moved to America, I worked with a company that did not offer health insurance unless you were a salaried employee. I met a gentleman from that company that suffered from a toothache for several months. I could tell his case was severe because he was not even enabled to eat regular food, and he had different types of over the counter medicines in his book bag, and also, his face gradually got deformed. I could tell that that gentleman was in constant pain because of the facial expression. None of the dentist offices that he contacted wanted to receive him because he had no insurance and those that accepted him requested at least two thousand dollars up front. One day, he passed out in his apartment, and one of his roommates called the ambulance. He woke up at the hospital with no memory of how he got there and his nurse told him that he had mouth surgery. My point here is that if the man had easy access to health insurance ( Physical, dental, vision), his situation would not have escalated to the point where he almost died. So I strongly believe that more people need to access health insurance so that everybody can get the chance to get minor health issues checked before they get out of hands.
People with pre-existing conditions can still get health insurance
According to the article “Don’t deny insurance to sick people. There are other ways to reduce health care costs.,” the authors say that before the ACA, about fifty million people had pre-existing health conditions that placed them at risk of losing health coverage. The authors use a cancer patient as an example of a person with a pre-existing condition and say that people in that situation were susceptible to get the payment of their medical expenses denied by their insurers before the ACA. They also say that those that change jobs had difficulties getting another coverage. So, my view here is that insurance companies should provide health coverage to everyone without any complications because people are sick and they need medical attention and any other type of support that will help them get through their situations.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HCA 205 Week 5 Discussion 1 PPACA and Your Take-Away done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Lower prescription drug costs
We did one simulation exercise where the patient, Trevor, could not refill his medication because he had no insurance and they were expensive. We can all agree that even though that was a simulation exercise, many people go through this every day. It is very frustrating and upsetting to know that someone got seen by his/her doctor, got a medical prescription, and cannot afford to buy his medicines. At some point, it seems like not seeing a doctor due to lack of money or insurance is not different from seeing a doctor and not having money to buy your medicines. So, the reason why I believe that medications should be affordable for patients is that patients have already spent a lot of money at the doctor’s office and some have only little left to buy medications.
The three keys elements of the act that I believe will be the most negative for the country are:
Constant changing
Even though the ACA is recently passed, it is going to change every year because some additional elements were delayed or suspended( Michael, Thomas, 2016). Getting additional elements or components very could mean anything from replacing a new regulation to an existing one or canceling a new regulation and replace it with nothing. So, every time that the ACA gets modified, your health insurance contract with change too. I believe that changing the ACA components every year is negative because it will make people live with a constant fear of an unexpected loss or cost augmentation of their health coverage.
You can get penalized if you do not have insurance
” If an individual goes without qualifying minimum essential coverage for more than a single period of up to three months in a year, he or she may owe a penalty under the Shared Responsibility payment.” (Michael, Thomas, 2016 ). The ACA is forcing people to get health insurance or making the situation look like not having health coverage is not different from breaking the law. I believe penalizing people for not having insurance is negative for the country because I know that we normally get penalized most of the time only when we do something stupid like driving above the speed limit, for example. I believe that everyone should be free to do what they think is best for them, and getting health coverage should be optional.
Many people are paying higher premiums
Because of the ACA, many people have been spending a lot of money out of pocket for medical expenses such as deductibles, copays, and coinsurance. Mr. Michael, Thomas says in his article that the out-of-pocket maximums coverage for an individual went from $6,600 in 2015 to $6,850 in 2016 and the family coverage went from $13,200 to $13,700 and this rate change were noticed in thirteen major cities in the U.S. After reading this article, I understand once again that no one wants to lose money, I realize that every single time that the ACA is going to get any type of modification someone’s pocket is going to suffer for it. I believe that making pay higher premiums is negative because it makes us spend more money out of our pockets.
Part II:
My definition of the U.S. healthcare system posted in week one.
I believe that the U.S. healthcare system is very capitalistic; money takes the first place, no matter what kind of disease the patient has. If someone gets “lucky” and gets treated first, he will be overwhelmed with medical bills later. About the medical care itself, I believe that the U.S. healthcare system is one of the best in the world. My new definition is not that different from the first, it is well known that the U.S. healthcare system is one of the best of the world, but the contrast is that many hospitals in this country practice patient dumping. Many hospitals in the U.S. choose to get rid of patients that have no income, or insurance because they are not making any money off those people. Many of those patients are undocumented immigrants, homeless, or mentally ill patients and they are sometimes dumped on the streets, homeless shelters, or other hospitals ( Tony, Abraham, 2018). This shows that the healthcare system in this country is all about money and nobody in this business chain (Doctor, Pharmacists, etc.) is ready to lose a dime. My first definition is broad, and I did not use an example to support my position. The second definition is more specific, and I used an example to show that the U.S. healthcare system is capitalistic and many of the people that run this system care more about the money than the people.
My vision of the U.S. healthcare system in the next 5 or 10 years.
There is no doubt that the technology is still going to be on point, but we will have more patients getting kicked out of hospitals because of the same reasons that I mentioned above. We can all agree that life is becoming much more expensive and many people are worrying more about feeding their families than getting them health coverage. That means we are going to have more uninsured people in the next five to ten years, more patient dumping because many people cannot afford to pay their medical bills. So the situation that we are living now will get worse because the healthcare system is capitalistic; meaning that you are useless if they cannot make a profit from you.
Any potential reforms, research, suggestions for improvements.
One suggestion that I have for the improvement of the health care system is that the government should reduce the cost of healthcare. I know this is not easy, but I strongly believe that nothing is impossible for the government because if they can find billions of dollars to send astronauts to the moon, then they can also find money to finance our health care system and make it affordable for everyone. Another suggestion I have is that this country needs to look around and study how countries like France, Canada, Australia and other developed countries manage their health care systems and come up with something that benefits everyone in this country.
References:
https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/patient-dumping-symptom-of-health-system-woes/516018/Links to an external site.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/health/obamacare-health-insurance-numbers-nchs.htmlLinks to an external site.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/07/12/cover-pre-existing-conditions-reduce-health-costs-other-ways-column/763590002/Links to an external site.
https://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/about-the-aca/pre-existing-conditions/index.htmlLinks to an external site.
More Americans than ever before have health insurance as more than 16 million Americans obtained insurance during the 1st 5 years of the PPACA with the majority being young adults.
Prescription drugs are now more affordable especially for senior citizens who tend to not be able to afford al of their medicines. The list of medications covered gets longer every year and saved people more than 15 billion by 2015.
More preventative care and screenings with low cost copays are now available. By paying more upfront for these services, you can hopefully save even more money down the road by not needing costly treatments. NEGATIVE KEY ELEMENTS
My job is one of those businesses that cut employee hours because of the PPACA. All crew members are allowed 28 hours max every week. They like the 2 hour gap before you get to the 30 hour full time mark. This has led to a lot of our employees taking on a 2nd part time job.
While it is a positive that pre-existing conditions and more services are now covered, this has resulted in a higher premium for those that previously had health insurance.
Since the goal of the PPACA was to ensure that every American had health insurance, the government is now choosing to fine those that don’t have any. I do not see how fining those with lower incomes is going to help them any.PART 2
My original definition was that “The American health care system has its pros and cons. There are many fantastic things about it, but at the same time there are a lot of things that need to be fixed.” I would now define it as the same. The difference is that now I have a better understanding on what exactly those pros and cons are.
Over the next 10 years I believe that technology will play a key part in the advancement of medical care. I also believe that unless the right balance is struck that this will also raise the cost of health care tremendously.
I feel that with the increase in the amount of urgent care centers that people will not go the emergency room as much and this benefits both the hospital and the patients that truly need to be there. Patients need to take a more pro active approach to their own care with preventative services such as immunizations, screenings, and daily aspirin use for seniors. Telehealth is also becoming very popular and I have actually seen this encouraged. This is a very cost effective way to offer early detection for patients.
Now that you have gone through this introductory class of the U.S. healthcare system, post a substantial response to the following:
Part I:
• The PPACA is considered the most comprehensive federal law on health care since the inception of Medicare and Medicaid.
o Examine three key elements of the act that you believe will be the most positive for the country (in your examination, you must include reasons behind your selection of these three elements).
o Examine three key elements of the act that you believe will be the most negative for the country (in your examination, you must include reasons behind your selection of these three elements).
Part II:
• Examine the future of health care in the United States.
o Look back to your own definition of the healthcare system posted in Week One. How would you define it now after studying health care throughout this course? Post both definitions and examine the differences.
o Examine where you see the U.S. healthcare system in the next 5 or 10 years. o Describe any potential reforms, research, suggestions for improvements, etc.
Note: The ACA is not considered a potential reform. It is already law. The reforms to be described in Part II should be those that have not yet occurred.
Guided Response: Review your classmates’ responses. Respond to at least two classmates by examining their response to Part II. Do you agree with their assessment? Why or why not? Explain your answer.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCA 205 Week 5 Discussion 1 PPACA and Your Take-Away
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires alot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
Include in-text citations in your response
Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
Follow APA-7th edition
Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
Follow APA 7th edition
Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
Here are some helpful links
Student paper example
Citing Sources
The Writing Center is a great resource
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
