Feb 23, 2024 NR393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3
NR393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3
NR393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3
Course Project Milestone 3: Guidelines
Updated 9/24/17
Purpose
To apply lessons innursing history to living nurses contributing to nursing history through aninterview and recording of historical information
Course Outcomes
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
The Course Projectenables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.
CO 1. Incorporate appropriatehistorical perspectives into current professional nursing practice (PO 2).
CO 4. Compare currentprofessional nursing practice roles with historical roles of the nurse (PO 7).
Points
The entire project isworth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 300 points of this total.
Due Date
Submit your completedNR393 Milestone 3 by the end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. MT.
Requirements andGuidelines
If submission method iswritten (typed on the template), do the following.
Carefully review thisMilestone 3 Guidelines document and the Milestone 3 Template (Links to anexternal site.)Links to an external site..
The interview must takeplace in a face-to-face or phone conversation only. An e-mail interview orasking the nurse to complete a written or typed interview is not permitted.
Download the Milestone 3Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. save it to yourcomputer in Microsoft Word 2010 (or later) as a .docx file with the file name:Your Last Name NR393 Milestone 3.docx.
Carefully review theassigned areas for Milestone 3, and type directly on your saved Milestone 3Template.
Use your instructor’sfeedback from Milestone 2 to revise your questions prior to the interview.
Submit your completedMilestone 3 Template by Sunday at the end of Week 6.
If submission method isaudio or audio/video, do the following.
Carefully review theMilestone 3 Guidelines document. The recording should be approximately 8 to 12minutes.
The interview must takeplace in a face-to-face or phone conversation only. An e-mail interview orasking the nurse to complete a written or typed interview is not permitted.
Edit the recording asneeded prior to submission.
The audio or AV filemust be able to be submitted on the Week 6 Assignments page and downloaded bythe instructor for scoring. If it cannot be attached or downloaded, you willneed to submit your Milestone 3 by typing on the Milestone 3 Template (Links toan external site.)Links to an external site..
Instructors are not ableto provide advice or technical support regarding recordings. Submission of arecording is not required.
Use your instructor’sfeedback from Milestone 2 to revise your questions prior to the interview.
Submit your completedMilestone 3 by Sunday at end of Week 6.
Note: Only one Milestone3 file is accepted. If you choose to use audio or AV, all parts of Milestone 3must be on that recording. Do not submit additional files.
NR393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3
Academic IntegrityReminder
Chamberlain College ofNursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of theAcademic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
Course Project Milestone 3Template
Prior to completing this template, carefully review CourseProject Milestone 3 Guidelines paying particular attention to how to name thedocument and all rubric requirements. After saving the document to yourcomputer, type your answers directly on this template, and save again. Thisassignment is due by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m.MT.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate
program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.
Check Out Also: NR 393 Week 2 Course Project Milestone 1
StudentName:_____________________
AssignmentCriteriaTypethe statements into the boxes below. Use exact words spoken by each person.Note:See Milestone 3Rubric for details required in each area.Introduction: StudentIntroduction and Statement of Purpose30points NurseIntroduction30points NurseStates Verbal Permission for Interview and Submission30points Questionsand Answers PrimaryQuestion 1 Follow-up a Follow-up b PrimaryQuestion 2 Follow-up a Follow-up b PrimaryQuestion 3 Follow-up a Follow-up b PrimaryQuestion 4 Follow-up a Follow-up b PrimaryQuestion 5 Follow-up a Follow-up b
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
Graded Item
Points
Weighting
Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8)
375
37.5%
Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3)
200
20%
Management of Power Paper (Week 5)
200
20%
Executive Summary (Week 7)
225
22.5%
Total
1,000
100%
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
Letter Grade
Points
Percentage
A
940–1,000
94% to 100%
A-
920–939
92% to 93%
B+
890–919
89% to 91%
B
860–889
86% to 88%
B-
840–859
84% to 85%
C+
810–839
81% to 83%
C
760–809
76% to 80%
F
759 and below
75% and below
NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
Performance Category
10
9
8
4
0
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category
10
9
8
4
0
Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category
5
4
3
2
0
Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.
(5 points possible per graded thread)
Exceeds minimum post requirements
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
Replies to a question posed by a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
Has only one post for the week
Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
Does not post to the thread
No connections are made to the topic
Minus 1 Point
Minus 2 Point
Minus 3 Point
Minus 4 Point
Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
2-3 errors in APA format.
Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
4-5 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is somewhat focused.
6-7 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
8-10 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style does not facilitate communication.
The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost
-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.
The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
