Feb 23, 2024 NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit; (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policy making process; and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.
Course Outcomes
CO 1: Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences of holistic-focused healthcare policies using evidence-based practice principles. (PO 1)
CO 2: Communicate with decision-makers to advocate for effective policies that impact nurses and nursing, consumers, or the healthcare system to foster population health including quality and safety. (PO 2)
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
CO 3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth concerning the advocacy role of the advanced practice nurse in fostering policy within diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3)
CO 4: Analyze social, historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policies while integrating professional values to impact population health. (PO 4)
CO 5: Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that fosters person-centered healthcare and nursing practice. (PO 5)
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment:
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points: 275 points
Requirements
Assignment Criteria for Presentation
Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilized during your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.
Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.
Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
Provide concluding statements summarizing the content.
Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.
Preparing the Presentation
After completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from the PowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.
Rubric
W7 Policymaker Presentation
W7 Policymaker PresentationCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisit Description50.0 pts Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation) 44.0 pts Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy. 40.0 pts Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity. 19.0 pts Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed 0.0 pts Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicymaker Response50.0 pts Slides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated. 44.0 pts Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy. 40.0 pts Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity. 19.0 pts Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail. 0.0 pts Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflections on Process50.0 pts Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes. 44.0 pts Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes. 40.0 pts Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity. 19.0 pts Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail. 0.0 pts There is no reflection on process.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFuture Opportunities50.0 pts Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing. 44.0 pts Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity. 40.0 pts Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing 19.0 pts Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no discussion of importance to nursing. 0.0 pts Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion45.0 pts Concluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner. 40.0 pts Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity. 36.0 pts Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity. 17.0 pts Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail. 0.0 pts No conclusion45.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format15.0 pts Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout. 13.0 pts There are 2-3 APA format errors. 12.0 pts There are 4-6 APA format errors 6.0 pts There are 6-7 APA format errors. 0.0 pts Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation/Writing15.0 pts Slide and speaker notes content are accurate. Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective. 13.0 pts Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions. Slides are + 1 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity. 12.0 pts Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style. Slides are + 2 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity. 6.0 pts Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style. Slides are + 3 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with multiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail. 0.0 pts Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.15.0 ptsTotal Points: 275.0
NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment – The Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation is due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. The guidelines are listed below. The guidelines and grading rubric are also located in Course Resources.
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit; (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policy making process; and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.
CO 1: Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences of holistic-focused healthcare policies using evidence-based practice principles. (PO 1)
CO 2: Communicate with decision-makers to advocate for effective policies that impact nurses and nursing, consumers, or the healthcare system to foster population health including quality and safety. (PO 2)
CO 3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth concerning the advocacy role of the advanced practice nurse in fostering policy within diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3)
CO 4: Analyze social, historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policies while integrating professional values to impact population health. (PO 4)
CO 5: Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that fosters person-centered healthcare and nursing practice. (PO 5)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points: 275 points
Assignment Criteria for Presentation
Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilized during your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.
Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.
Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
Provide concluding statements summarizing the content.
Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.
After completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from the PowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.
Rubric
W7 Policymaker Presentation
W7 Policymaker Presentation
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisit Description
50.0 pts
Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation)
44.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.
40.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.
19.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed
0.0 pts
Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicymaker Response
50.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.
44.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.
40.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
19.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.
0.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflections on Process
50.0 pts
Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.
44.0 pts
Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.
40.0 pts
Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
19.0 pts
Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.
0.0 pts
There is no reflection on process.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFuture Opportunities
50.0 pts
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
44.0 pts
Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.
40.0 pts
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing
19.0 pts
Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no discussion of importance to nursing.
0.0 pts
Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
45.0 pts
Concluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.
40.0 pts
Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.
36.0 pts
Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.
17.0 pts
Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
