Feb 23, 2024 NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion
NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion
NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion
Discuss the best approach for communicating with your local legislator or policymaker in your policy-priority issue. What is your rationale for this approach?
As far as meeting with local legislators or policymakers, I am sure that the best approach would be trying to find a time to meet face to face with them. However, due to the current circumstances, I think a telephone call or e-mail may work best. Illinois State Representative, Norine Hammond, is running for re-election this year and the Primary election starts on Tuesday. I feel that she has much more important things to do for her own success than to take time to meet with me. Of course, I have never met her, so she could be willing to take the time to sit down and talk, but I will understand if she would rather not due to the timing. Timing could also be a factor as I am due to have another baby at any time in the next 2 ½ weeks. I would hate to schedule a time to meet with her and then have to back out due to being in the hospital or trying to recover at home. As I mentioned, if she would meet with me, I would make sure she was aware of my circumstances in case I had to cancel at the last minute.
I think e-mail is less personal of course, but I also think it is much easier for people who have a busy schedule, because it then allows them to respond at their convenience. With the Primary election beginning this week, Ms. Hammond will definitely be busy. However, it is said that someone would need to ask six people in person to have the same power of an email with 200 recipients (Bohns, 2017). For that reason, I would prefer a phone call conversation over an email conversation. I also think that conversations over email or text can easily be misinterpreted and I think there is great significance in immediate responses as well as changes in voice. I know for me personally, it is much easier to say “no” in an email than it is on the phone or in person. It is also easier for me to argue my case in person rather than in text form.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Because Ms. Hammond will be helping me out with my class, I will be appreciative of whatever she has to offer.
Reference:
Bohns, V. (2017). A face-to-face request is 34 times more successful than an email. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2017/04/a-face-to-face-request-is-34-times-more-successful-than-an-email
As far as meeting with local legislators or policymakers, I am sure that the best approach would be trying to find a time to meet face to face with them. However, due to the current circumstances, I think a telephone call or e-mail may work best. Illinois State Representative, Norine Hammond, is running for re-election this year and the Primary election starts on Tuesday. I feel that she has much more important things to do for her own success than to take time to meet with me. Of course, I have never met her, so she could be willing to take the time to sit down and talk, but I will understand if she would rather not due to the timing. Timing could also be a factor as I am due to have another baby at any time in the next 2 ½ weeks. I would hate to schedule a time to meet with her and then have to back out due to being in the hospital or trying to recover at home. As I mentioned, if she would meet with me, I would make sure she was aware of my circumstances in case I had to cancel at the last minute.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion:
I think e-mail is less personal of course, but I also think it is much easier for people who have a busy schedule, because it then allows them to respond at their convenience. With the Primary election beginning this week, Ms. Hammond will definitely be busy. However, it is said that someone would need to ask six people in person to have the same power of an email with 200 recipients (Bohns, 2017). For that reason, I would prefer a phone call conversation over an email conversation. I also think that conversations over email or text can easily be misinterpreted and I think there is great significance in immediate responses as well as changes in voice. I know for me personally, it is much easier to say “no” in an email than it is on the phone or in person. It is also easier for me to argue my case in person rather than in text form.
Because Ms. Hammond will be helping me out with my class, I will be appreciative of whatever she has to offer.
Reference:
Bohns, V. (2017). A face-to-face request is 34 times more successful than an email. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2017/04/a-face-to-face-request-is-34-times-more-successful-than-an-email
I liked your post. I think meeting with a state representative that is currently going through a re-election year is interesting. If you could possibly meet with this person face-to-face that would mean so much more than just discussing healthcare policy issues. You could speak about her future election and the implications that may have on her career. The side that she takes on your healthcare policy issue could even play a role into how may vote in the coming election (barring that you are in her district to vote). However, like you stated, having an e-mail conversation can essentially provide you with the proper means of attaining all the information you will need for this class and your healthcare policy issue. Here’s what I found during my research related to e-mail communication with legislators, Results indicate that e-mail is much more useful to communicate with some audiences than others. In particular, legislators in our sample are very likely to see e-mail as a positive development for communicating with constituents and policy insiders with somewhat less positive views on e-mail with intermediary groups” Richardson (2006).
References
Richardson, J. E., & Cooper, C. A. (2006). E-mail Communication and the Policy Process in the State Legislature. Policy Studies Journal, 34(1), 113-129. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00148.x
Communicating with Legislators
Before approaching a policymaker, it is wise to know the background of the person you will be interviewing (Kachel, 2014). You should know what their stance is on the issues you will be discussing (Kachel, 2014). Since my husband works in the Jacksonville North Pulaski School District, I have been able to ask both him and his coworkers about Daniel Gray, the President of the Jacksonville North Pulaski School Board. Mr. Gray is involved in the district’s athletic department, so I feel children and physical activity are important to him. I surmised he would be a good person to speak with since he shares a similar interest in children’s health. By knowing your subject’s background, you will know the best way to explain your policy that will peak interest in your audience (Kachel, 2014). It is important when speaking about your policy that you can show some personal connection to the issue (Kachel, 2014). By showing how this issue affects you, the policymaker will be able to understand your passion and realize the importance of the issue (Kachel, 2014). On the other hand, if someone is presenting a policy and acts as if they have no investment in the issue or could basically care less, why would the policy maker care? Working in an orthopedic unit has allowed me to see what long-term effects childhood obesity can have on adults. Eating habits and physical activity are created as children. If schools implement avenues to address the obesity issue, they can prevent many people from developing medical conditions and even an early death. I feel my current jobsite then provides me with topics I can personally discuss with Mr. Gray. Like any conversation, presenting a policy is going to come across best if it can be done in person (Kachel, 2014); this approach adds a face to the issue. Discussions done by electronic communication can sometimes cause information to get lost in translation or come across differently than the presenter is intending. I plan to contact Mr. Gray via email to set up a meeting time that is convenient for him. Ideally, I would like to be able to speak with him in person, but a phone call might be the only option. Before the initial meeting, it is helpful to send information on the topic you will be presenting (Kachel, 2014). This step will enable your policy maker to list questions and concerns for the discussion. Sending information before the meeting provides time for the other person to perform his own research on the issue. Likewise, being prepared for the presentation hopefully demonstrates the importance of your issue to your policy maker; it emphasizes the need for supporting your viewpoint. Researching the background on the issue is the first step. To hit a homerun, you must convey the importance of the problem by being well prepared for your presentation.
References
KACHEL, D. E. (2014). Communicating with Legislators. School Library Monthly
My chosen policy concern is the lack of a law requiring children to wear bicycle helmets in the state of Illinois. In 2010 Il Senator Silverstein backed a bill that would require a child under the age of 16 to wear a helmet while riding a bicycle. The bill did not pass at that time. I plan to contact the senator by phone through his office to begin. Hopefully I can set up a face to face meeting with him. Before my meeting I will be doing a lot more research to make sure I know the history of the bill and reasons it was not passed. I will also see if any nursing organizations have gotten involved in child helmet laws in the past. Since I am attempting to talk directly to the senator I anticipate that it may be difficult to talk directly to him. I will have to patient but also expect to be referred to his assistants. I believe an important tactic for my initial discussion needs to be very clear and concise. The reason this will be important is because the senator has a lot of people with concerns that he has to try and make time for. He will be more responsive to requests from someone who has done their research and can present their concerns concisely.
I had a difficult time finding a research article about lobbying for a cause but I was able to find one that I found interesting. The article used terms that were difficult to follow at times but Ridge, Ingram, & Hill (2017) were interested in looking into whether firms who expend resources and spend additional time and effort lobbying will have better outcomes than those who dot expend the same amount. The researchers found that those that did more did not necessarily mean that they would receive more benefits. They stated that there was a point when governmental entities reached diminishing returns when lobbying breadth was high. So more isn’t always better!
Resources
Ridge, J.W., Ingram, A., Hill, A.D., (2017). Beyond lobbying expenditures: How lobbying breadth and political connectedness affect firm outcomes. Academy of Management Journals 60(3), 1138-1163. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.201.0584
Thank you for responding to my post. After, I read your response, I decided to take the extra step to draft an email to Rep. Cooper’s administrative assistant. This will put my back-up plan in motion. Within my letter, I wrote that I have requested a meeting with Rep. Cooper, but I would be eager to meet with her in case the Rep. Cooper is too busy. I agree that the power of administrative assistant’s is often overlooked. I also want to stress the importance of drafting a professional email. I stay in contact with tutors at the writing center, so I will also book an appointment to have one of them look over my letters for conciseness, grammar, and punctuation. I learned a lot about these writing elements in my undergraduate program, but I would feel more comfortable knowing an extra set of trained eyes have gone over my email drafts. I must also remember to send a thank you correspondence once I receive a response from either person and ask how long my meeting will last if that information has not been provided. I do not want to go over my time limit. I think the two most powerful pieces of information that I leave with my legislator or her assistant will be my one-page summary fact sheet and my PPT presentation. If I really want to my policy maker to listen, I must develop a relationship with this person (NAEYC, 2018). I read that learning about the background of my policy maker will also make a difference in how my message is received (NAEYC, 2018).
Reference:
NAEYC. (2018). Mastering meetings with policymakers. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/our-work/public-policy-advocacy/mastering-meetings-policymakers
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
