Feb 23, 2024 Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder
Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder
Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder
The DSM V describes Bipolar disorder as a group of mental disorders that result in extreme fluctuation in an individual’s mood, energy, and functioning. Bipolar disorder presents with intervals of deep, prolonged, and profound depression that alternate with intervals of mania characterized by an excessively elevated or irritable mood (APA, 2013). A manic episode represents a significant change from usual behavior. It manifests with at least three of the following symptoms: Inflated self-esteem or grandiosity, increased talkativeness, decreased need for sleep, racing thoughts, easy distraction, increase in goal-directed activity, and engaging in activities that have negative consequences (APA, 2013). This paper seeks to review a client with Bipolar disorder and outline the client’s treatment plan using a decision tree.
Case Study Overview
The case scenario depicts a 26-year-old woman of Korean descent on her first appointment after a 21-day hospitalization for acute mania. The client has been diagnosed with bipolar I disorder. Her current weight is 110 pounds, and her height is 5’ 5. She describes her mood as fantastic and mentions that she sleeps roughly 5 hours/night, but she hates sleep because it is not fun (Laureate Education, 2016). The client’s patient records show that she is in overall good health and her lab results are within normal limits.
However, genetic testing shows that she is positive for the CYP2D6*10 allele. The client admits that she stopped taking Lithium after being discharged two weeks ago. On MSE, the client is alert and oriented to person, place, time, and event. Her dressing is odd, and her speech is rapid, pressured, and tangential. Her self-reported mood is euthymic, and her affect is broad. She denies visual or auditory hallucinations, and she has no overt delusional or paranoid thought processes readily apparent (Laureate Education, 2016). Her insight is impaired, but she denies suicidal or homicidal ideation. She scores 22 on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Decision Point One
Begin Lithium 300 mg orally BID.
Why I Selected This Decision
Lithium is a mood stabilizer recommended for treating Mania in Bipolar disorder and maintenance therapy of bipolar disorder in persons with a history of mania. I selected Lithium because it targets unstable mood, which is the major symptom of mania (Won & Kim, 2017). Besides, mania is recommended as first-line therapy for long-term prevention of Bipolar disorder, particularly for euphoric mania.
I did not select Seroquel because it has documented side effects of dry mouth, fatigue, constipation, and dizziness, contributing to decreased medication compliance. Seroquel is also associated with increased appetite and weight and elevated triglycerides and total cholesterol levels (Shah et al., 2017). The side effects make it an inappropriate drug since the client is overweight. I did not select Risperdal since the patient was positive for the CYP2D6*10 allele. According to Puangpetch et al. (2016), the CYP2D6*10 allele slows the drug’s clearance resulting in high levels of Risperdal in the blood, causing sedation.
What I Was Hoping To Achieve By Making This Decision
I hoped that prescribing Lithium would stabilize the patient’s mood and reduce the severity of manic symptoms by at least 50% in the first four weeks of treatment. According to Won and Kim (2017), Lithium exerts mood-stabilizing effects by acting on cellular targets and exerting neuroprotective effects.
How Ethical Considerations May Impact the Treatment Plan and Communication with Patients
Ethical principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence may impact the treatment plan as the PMHNP has a duty to prevent harm and promote better patient outcomes. The PMHNP is obliged to assess a drug for its impact and potential side effects before prescribing it to ensure it will promote better outcomes and have no adverse consequences to the patient (Bipeta, 2019). In this case, the PMHNP assessed each drug’s potential side effects and selected the one associated with better outcomes and fewer adverse effects.
Decision Point Two
Assess rationale for non-compliance to elicit reason for non-compliance and educate the client on drug effects and pharmacology.
Why I Selected This Decision
I selected this decision because the client reported taking the medication “off and on” when she feels that she needs it. The decision aimed at understanding the primary cause for the patient not complying with the medication (Won & Kim, 2017). Besides, educating the patient on the possible side effects and pharmacology of Lithium would enlighten her on the drug’s impact in improving her health outcomes.
I did not increase Lithium to 450 mg because the non-compliance behavior would persist if the reasons for the behavior were not identified and addressed. Besides, it is crucial that the PMHNP assess a patient’s response to Lithium and associated side effects before increasing the dose (Won & Kim, 2017). I did not switch treatment to Depakote because the patient’s response to Lithium had not been established. According to Shah et al. (2017), the evidence for Depakote efficacy in acute depression is not as robust as that for Lithium.
What I Was Hoping To Achieve By Making This Decision
I was hoping that assessing and eliciting reason for non-compliance would help in identifying a practical solution to increasing compliance and eventually improve the manic symptoms. I was hoping that educating the patient on Lithium’s drug effects and pharmacology would enable her to understand the importance of adhering to treatment and increase her medication compliance.
How Ethical Considerations May Impact the Treatment Plan and Communication with Patients
The ethical principle of autonomy, which means that patients have a right to make decisions about their lives without interference from others, may impact the treatment plan. The PMHNP must respect the patient’s decision regarding her care which may impact the treatment interventions (Bipeta, 2019). In this case, the PMHNP had to elicit the rationale for the patient not complying with treatment, which determined the next intervention.
Decision Two
Selected Decision
Dropping the dose to 1mg Risperdal HS
Rationale for Selection
Although the patient came back to the facility with insignificant reduction in symptoms, it does not imply that the medication failed to work on the patient. The only challenge reported was the manifestation of the side effects of the Risperdal such as sedation and lethargy, which were attributed
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT, ORIGINAL PAPER ON Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder
to higher concentration of the drug in the blood of the Asian patient. Consequently, Stahl (2013) argues that it is imperative to reduce the routine dosage of the Risperdal to half strength so as to lessen the concentration of plasma. However, opting for other options at this stage such as recommending the use of lithium to the patient is not recommended because of potential side effects and even interrupting with initial response to the Risperdal drugs. Moreover, changing the medication might impact the patient negatively by getting her confused and give up on effectiveness of medication if any time she visits the clinic, a different drug is prescribed. Therefore, it is only prudent to intervene by reducing the dosage of the drug.
Expected Outcomes
Risperdal drugs tend to work by inhibiting the dopamine and serotonin receptors. Therefore, reduction of the Risperdal dose may mitigate this effect. Nonetheless, the expectation is that side effects of sedation and lethargy are likely to withdraw between two to three weeks. Given that the symptoms of bipolar disorder in the patient reported improvement, it is expected that the Risperdal drug will still reduce the symptoms of the condition regardless of the reduced dosage (Stahl & Stahl, 2013). The patient is expected to visit the facility again after four weeks feeling energetic, increased interest in routine daily activities, better sleeping pattern, and controlled mood.
Difference between Expected Outcomes and Actual Outcomes
The patient visited the hospital four weeks after the last visit and confirmed that the symptoms of the side effects of sedation and lethergy improved. Besides, the patient’s symptoms of depression and maniac also reduced by half from the from the last visit. Nonetheless, the patient still compalined about minimal interuption in the sleeping patterns and less interest in routine activities. Essentially, these patient outcomes regarding the side efects were expected. Nevertheless, for the overall outcomes for the bipolar disorder, the results were unexpected because the drug did not entirely eradicate the bipolar disorder in patient after weeks on the drug as was expected.
Bipolar disorder is a unique disorder that causes shifts in mood and energy, which results in depression and mania for clients. Proper diagnosis of this disorder is often a challenge for two reasons: 1) clients often present as depressive or manic, but may have both; and 2) many symptoms of bipolar disorder are similar to other disorders. Misdiagnosis is common, making it essential for you to have a deep understanding of the disorder’s pathophysiology. For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat clients presenting with bipolar disorder.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Assess client factors and history to develop personalized plans of bipolar therapy for clients
Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in clients requiring bipolar therapy
Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans
Analyze ethical and legal implications related to prescribing bipolar therapy to clients across the lifespan ..
Assignment: Assessing and Treating Patients With Bipolar Disorder
Bipolar disorder is a rare disorder that causes mood and energy swings in patients, resulting in depression and mania. Appropriate diagnosis of this disorder is frequently difficult for two reasons:1) Patients frequently present as depressive or manic, but may exhibit both; and 2) numerous symptoms of bipolar disorder resemble those of other disorders. Due to the high rate of misdiagnosis, it is critical that you have a thorough understanding of the disorder’s pathophysiology. Consider how you might assess and treat patients who present with bipolar disorder in this Assignment as you examine the patient case study in this week’s Learning Resources.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication Resources indicated for this week.
Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of patients requiring bipolar therapy.
The Assignment: 5 pages
Examine Case Study: An Asian American Woman. Diagnosis-Bipolar Disorder. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.
Introduction to the case (1 page)
Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1 page)
Which decision did you select?
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #2 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #3 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Conclusion (1 page)
Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of five academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be utilizing the primary and secondary literature.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
The Assignment
Examine Case Study: An Asian American Woman With Bipolar Disorder. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point stop to complete the following:
Decision #1
Which decision did you select?
Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
Decision #2
Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
Decision #3
Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
you can use my sample/ edit or do a new assignment.
you can edit or use my sample with same medication therapy.
Walden University .. 6630n
2 Assessing and Treatment for Bipolar Disorder Patient Introduction Bipolar disorder is not an uncommon illness. It is a very chronic and severe mental disorder, affecting approximately 1-2% of the adult population. The signs and symptoms of bipolar disorder are different depending on the type of episode (i.e., manic or depressive). Each episode marks a critical change from the way a person usually acts and their typical mood, and can be characterized by a sudden change in the general attitude of the patient, the way the patient thinks and the behavior. 1 The changes will be sudden that it will be noticed by people around (Robert et al., 2017). This dangerous demonstrative unpredictability mood disorder can be found in all area of life, that is, from the poor to the rich, this disorder affects millions of people in all facets of life (Robert et al., 2017). Bipolar disorder can be seen mostly in the age starting at 25years or older, but it is not totally absent in the teenage age. It shows that about 2.6 percent of the population are diagnosed as bipolar. 3 (National Alliance on Mental Illness, 2017).
If not well treated ,Bipolar disorder can be critical; 1 early identification of symptoms with an appropriate treatment plan may include psychotherapy, medications, a healthy lifestyle and a regular schedule will keep the patient healthy (National Alliance on Mental Illness. (2017). 1 The NP should have a good understand of this disorder to be able to take care of this the patient because of its long-term management and how it affects the health in totality (National Alliance on Mental Illness. (2017). 1 My focus of this paper will look into an Asian American Woman with a bipolar disorder, symptoms management, diagnosing the symptom, and the complete treatment. The paper will consider the most safe and appropriate options of treatment and the outcome as the treatment, and care.
Decision Selected My patient is an Asian American woman age 39 years with 4 children and 3 ground children. The husband notices that sometimes she will be singing loud to the top of her voice and dancing not to the music she sang. In another time she will just fill like not doing anything and nothing will interest her, and she will lay on the bed for hours without going to the business she spent her years building and love so much.Patient is withdrawn and non-interactive. 4 She is diagnosed Bipolar disorder.
1 Decision # 1 Reason Selected My best treatment of choice for this disorder will be to begin Risperdal 2 mg orally twice a day. Risperdal is the best choice to treat bipolar disorder. (Lee et al., 2011). Risperdal called risperidone is in the chemical class benzisoxazole derivatives which are antipsychotic. It is an effective medication for bipolar disorder (Lee et al., 2011). The reasons of choosing Risperdal is because it is used to treat schizophrenia and the risperidone works with the brain to stabilize the brain (Lee et al., 2011). Risperidone rebalances dopamine and serotonin to improve thinking, mood, and behavior. Risperidone belongs to a class of drugs called atypical antipsychotics approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) The drug is also used to treat symptoms of bipolar disorder and irritability (NAMI, 2017).
Expected Results We will need to have some subjective and objective changes. 1Patient should be able to verbalize changes within the first month of the treatment.
During the next visit with the patient after one month, she is expected to express changes in the clarity of her brain. The freedom from indistinctness or ambiguity because of the medicine will help her to balance certain natural substances in her brain.She should also notice a change in her ability to concentrate on her activities (Lee et al., 2011). No side effects.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
