Abstract
Study Objective:
Goal of this study is to present a cases series endorsing same-day discharge after minimally invasive robotic surgery for endometrial cancer and to determine factors that affect the length of hospital stay.
Design:
Retrospective study is comprised of all cases (N = 78) by a single gynecologic oncologist (July 2017 to July 2019) that involved a robotic-assisted total hysterectomy (RTH) with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and total pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test and two-sided t-test respectively. Multivariate correlation analysis was utilized to determine risk factor influence on length of stay. Factors that may affect same-day discharge: surgery time, estimated blood loss, time of day (start of surgery after 15:00), cystoscopy, complexity of surgery, comorbidities, FIGO grade from endometrial biopsy pre-operatively, FIGO stage.
Setting:
Community hospital in El Paso, TX, a borderland city primarily comprised of a Hispanic population.
Patients:
78 patients who underwent robotic total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and total pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical treatment of endometrial cancer.
Measurements and Main Results:
Total of 78 women with a median age of 61.8 years-old underwent RTH + BSO + surgical staging, and 56 (71.8%) of patients were successfully discharged the same day (< 24 h) despite no ERAS protocol. Number of comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), FIGO grade, surgery time of day, and surgery length did not have a statistically significant effect on length of stay. Of the same-day discharge cases, 20 (35.7%) were immediately discharged following post-op recovery (within 4 h). Patients were more likely to stayed longer than 24 hours if they were older (> 60 y), higher estimated blood loss (> 30 cc), higher surgical complexity (para-aortic lymphadenectomy and/or omentectomy performed), or higher FIGO stage (> IB).
Conclusion:
Same-day discharge is feasible following minimally invasive robotic surgery for endometrial cancer, despite multiple comorbidities, later surgery time of day, and higher FIGO grade.
Keywords: Same-day discharge; Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery; Endometrial cancer; Gynecologic oncology
Introduction
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in women and 9
th
most common cancer in women overall [1-2]. Moreover, incidence and mortality of endometrial cancer in the United States are increasing with an estimated 63,230 new cases and 11,350 deaths in 2018 [2-3]. Endometrial cancer is typically diagnosed in postmenopausal women who present with vaginal bleeding. First-line treatment for earlystage endometrial cancer is primary surgical resection via total hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and possible lymphadenectomy [4]. This surgery was traditionally performed via laparotomy, but now a minimally invasive approach has proven to be feasible and preferred with fewer surgical complications and shorter hospital stays [5-19].
To our knowledge, there are no consensus recommendations at a national level that endorse same-day discharge for minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer. As the field of robotic surgery has grown significantly since its FDA approval in 2000, more and more physicians advocate for same-day discharge due to smaller incisions, better-controlled pain, and quicker recovery [7-8]. In gynecologic surgery, simple minimally invasive oophorectomies and ovarian cystectomies commonly have same-discharge. In comparison, many gynecologists admit their patients for overnight observation after more complex surgeries, like minimally invasive total hysterectomies [8]. The reasoning behind overnight observation is to detect potential perioperative complications, such as hemorrhage or unintentional injury to other pelvic structures, such as the ureters [5].
However, multiple studies have recently demonstrated feasibility and safety for same-day discharge status post minimally invasive hysterectomies without the need for reoperations or hospital admissions caused by perioperative complications [5, 8-17]. While some institutions have reported same-day discharge rates following minimally invasive hysterectomy as high as 93%, the national incidence is < 10% [5, 9]. Patients even report same or greater satisfaction with same-day discharge compared to 23-hour overnight observation in the hospital [8-9, 12]. Excluding high-risk patients with pre-planned hospital admission, some studies have found that longer operation time, later surgical end-time in the day, higher surgical complexity, increased age, and non-minimally invasive approach decrease the likelihood of same-day discharge [5, 8-9, 15-17].
The goal of this study is to present a cases series endorsing same-day discharge for minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer and to determine predictive factors. There is supporting data from multiple institutions that demonstrates feasibility and safety of same-day discharge for women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Methods
Participants
All patients of single gynecologic oncologist who underwent a robotic-assisted total hysterectomy (RTH) with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer between July 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for potential inclusion (N=78). The initial cohort was evaluated for chronic pelvic pain as an exclusion characteristic, though none matched this criterion. By study design, patients who underwent a non-robotic-assisted approach were excluded.
Surgical Methods
The underlying indication for RTH was a positive endometrial biopsy (EMB), though 4 (5.1%) patients did not undergo EMB prior to surgery. The RTH and BSO was performed using four ports, one of which was utilized as an assistant-port. Local anesthesia was injected at the port sites prior to incision and after closure. All specimens were removed via the vagina.
Recovery Protocol
No strict Enhanced Recovery after (gynecologic) Surgery (ERAS) protocol was followed. Patients were encouraged to ambulate and advance diet as tolerated. Foley catheter was removed immediately following surgery in most cases. Patients had standard anesthesia care. Postoperative analgesia consisted of hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg quantity 10-15, unless patient pain threshold necessitated further management in PACU.
Variables Recorded
Baseline demographic variables recorded were age and body mass index (BMI). Clinical characteristics noted were comorbidities, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) grade, preoperative diagnosis, postoperative diagnosis, surgical procedures performed, surgery start time, and surgery length. Surgical outcomes documented were estimated blood loss (EBL), FIGO stage, surgical complications, reasons and length of hospital stay.
Statistical Analyses
Sample size was calculated using alpha set at 0.05, power set at 90%, and known population incidence set at 10% [5]. Minimum of 4 subjects were required for analysis to achieve statistical power. Continuous variables were calculated using two-sided t-tests and are expressed as
median (range).
Categorical variables were computed with the Chi-square test and are written as
number of cases (percentage of occurrence).
Multivariate analyses were executed using logistic and linear regression models. These regression models evaluated the correlation between the demographic and clinical variables compared to length of stay. Statistical significance was set at
p
<0.05 prior to data collection, and significant values are denoted with an asterisk. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and JASP version 0.9.2 (University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychological Methods, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Results
A total of 78 patients underwent surgical management for endometrial cancer between July 2017 and July 2019. The demographic and clinical characteristics by length of stay were not significantly different between the groups of same-day discharge (? 24 h) and admitted (> 24 h); however, age becomes significant when dichotomized above and below age 60 (Table 1).
|
Table 1 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
| Demographic and clinical characteristics by length of stay | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Characteristic | ? 24 h(N = 56) | > 24 h (N=22) |
p value |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Age, y | 62.25 (28 91) | 61.09 (40 88) | 0.628 | |||||||
| ? 60, > 60 | 20 (36.0%), 36 (64.0%) | 14 (64.0%), 8 (36.0%) |
0.025* |
|||||||
|
BMI, kg/m 2 |
35.22 (21.79 55.78) | 32.26 (18.44 50.07) | 0.129 | |||||||
| ? 30, > 30 | 17 (30.4%), 39 (69.6%) | 10 (45.5%), 12 (54.5%) | 0.207 | |||||||
| Comorbidities | 0.788 | |||||||||
| ? 1, > 1 | 17 (30.4%), 39 (69.6%) | 6 (27.3%), 16 (72.7%) | ||||||||
| Histologic grade | 0.122 | |||||||||
| I, II III | 26 (46.4%), 30 (53.6%) | 6 (27.3%). 16 (72.7%) | ||||||||
In this study, surgical complexity is distinguished by the performance of additional staging procedures.
Simple
indicates that only pelvic lymph nodes were dissected.
Complex
denotes that para-aortic lymphadenectomy and/or infracolic omentectomy occurred. No intraoperative complications occurred during any of the cases. Length of stay was significantly associated with surgery time, EBL, surgical complexity, and FIGO stage (Table 2). There was no significant difference in surgery start time between the two groups.
|
Table 2 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
| Surgical outcomes by length of stay | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Characteristic | ? 24 h(N = 56) | > 24 h (N=22) |
p value |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Surgery time, min | 150.98 (68 256) | 170.36 (103 233) |
0.048* |
|||||||
| ? 120 > 120 | 10 (17.9%), 46 (82.1%) | 4 (18.2%), 18 (81.8%) |
0.048* |
|||||||
| Surgery start time | 0.789 | |||||||||
| Before 15:00, After 15:00 | 9 (16.1%), 47 (83.9%) | 3 (13.6%), 19 (86.4%) | ||||||||
| EBL, cc | 32.68 (10 -100) | 51.59 (10-200) |
0.021* |
|||||||
| ? 30, > 30 | 44 (78.6%), 12 (21.4%) | 12 (54.5%), 10 (45.5%) |
0.34* |
|||||||
| Surgical complexity |
0.004* |
|||||||||
| Simple, Complex | 14 (25.0%), 42 (75.0%) | 13 (59.1%), 9 (40.9%) | ||||||||
| FIGO stage |
0.009* |
|||||||||
| IA, IB-IV | 36 (64.3%), 20 (35.7%) | 7 (31.8%), 15 (68.2%) | ||||||||
Multivariate models for predictors of same-day discharge demonstrated statistically significant relationships with age > 60 y, EBL ? 30, lower surgical complexity, and FIGO stage ? IA (Table 3).
|
Table 3 |
|
|
||
| Multivariate analysis for predictors of same-day discharge (< 24 h) after RTH | ||||
| < 24 h (N=56) | ||||
| Characteristic | Coefficient | 95% Confidence interval |
p value |
|
|
|
||||
| Age >60 | 0.253 | 0.451, 0.033 |
0.025* |
|
| Comorbidities ? 1 | 0.030 | 0.251, -0.193 | 0.791 | |
| BMI ? 30 | -0.143 | 0.082, -0.193 | 0.212 | |
| FIGO grade ? 1 | 0.175 | 0.383, -0.049 | 0.125 | |
| Surgery start time before 15:00 | 0.030 | 0.251, -0.193 | 0.792 | |
| Surgery length ? 120 | -0.004 | 0.219, -0.226 | 0.974 | |
| EBL ? 30 | 0.240 | 0.439, 0.019 |
0.034* |
|
| Surgery complexity- only pelvic lymphadenectomy | 0.322 | -0.108, -0.509 |
0.004* |
|
| FIGO stage ? IA | 0.294 | 0.485, 0.076 |
0.009* |
|
Of the 56 (71.8%) patients discharged home within 24 hours, 20 (35.7%) patients were immediately discharged within 4 hours. Multivariate analysis showed slightly different predictors in this subgroup. Discharge within 4 hours was associated with well-differentiated FIGO grade, surgery start time prior to 15:00, EBL ? 30, and FIGO stage ? IA (Table 4).
|
Table 4 |
|
|
|||
| Multivariate analysis for predictors of immediate discharge (< 4 h) after RTH | |||||
| < 4 h (N=20) | |||||
| Characteristic | Coefficient | 95% Confidence interval |
p value |
||
|
|
|||||
| Age >60 | -0.076 | 0.312, -0.129 | 0.509 | ||
| Comorbidities ? 1 | 0.007 | 0.229, -0.216 | 0.954 | ||
| BMI ? 30 | 0.005 | 0.293, -0.149 |
0.967
Categories:
| ||
