Feb 23, 2024 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan NUR 590
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan NUR 590
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan NUR 590
Assessment Description
In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT ON Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan NUR 590
Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Evaluation Plan
Evaluation is one of the last phases of an evidence-based practice process. Therefore, it is important for the change implementers to formulate an appropriate evaluation plan that can be used in guiding the evaluation phase. Evaluation is important as it offers insight into how the project was effective in achieving the set objectives (Hopp & Rittenmeyer, 2021). In addition, it also helps in assessing how effective the methods applied in the project were toward achieving the project goals. It is important to let every stakeholder know of the evaluation plans in time so that they can have a better grasp of every aspect of the project. Therefore, the purpose of this assignment is to formulate an evaluation plan for the proposed EBP project.
The Expected Outcomes
The project focuses on using automated fall detectors to reduce the incidences of falls among elderly patients of sixty-five years and above. Therefore, there are various expected outcomes of the proposed EBP project. One of the expected outcomes is a reduction in the number of falls among elderly patients admitted to the facility (Bet et al.,2019). It is expected that the automated fall detectors will be able to help the nursing staff detect potential patient falls so that they be prevented. The project will also involve training the nursing staff on how to use the automated fall detectors. Therefore, another expected outcome regarding this project is improved knowledge among the nurses regarding the use of automated fall detectors to help prevent patient falls. It is also expected that the organization will adopt the solution to part of the normal or routine care of the elderly patients admitted to the facility.
Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.
Choosing the right data collection tools is key in ensuring the right kind of data is collected since such data is used in evaluating the project’s efficacy. Therefore, various data collection tools will be used in this project. One of the tools is the electronic health records which will be used as a source of data regarding patient fall incidences, both before and after the implementation of the intervention. Another targeted tool is questionnaires (Linsley et al.,2019). Questionnaires will be key in determining the nurses’ knowledge regarding the use of automated fall detectors to control patient falls.
Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.
Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.
Propose strategies that will be taken if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.
Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan NUR 590
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You must cite at least five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last five years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style, formatting criteria, and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines in the APA Style Guide in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Discuss the difference between statistically significant evidence and clinically significant evidence. How would each of these findings be used to advance an evidenced-based practice project?
Clinically significant and statistically significant evidence are related, but do not mean the same thing. Statistical significance utilizes the probability value (p-value), and it tells a researcher the probability or chance that the results from the study are a random occurrence versus an actual difference between the variables (Heavey, 2015).
Statistical significance also uses the alpha value and when the analysis of the results of the study are done and the p-value is less than the alpha value, it means that the data shows the results was real and did not occur by chance which makes the results statistically significant.
Regarding clinical significance, the researchers determine if the statistical significance is substantial enough to be clinically important and should be used to help direct the course of patient care (Heavey, 2015).
Sometimes the results may be statistically significant, although may not clinically significant meaning that the results do not show that it is helpful and should not be used to help guide clinical practice. However, statistical significance has to be established before clinical significance can be determined (Heavey, 2015).
These findings can be used to advance an evidence-based practice (EBP) project. Statistical significance helps to determine if something occurred by chance or not. If it did not occur by chance, that means it is statistically significant and can help determine the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis (Armijo-Olivo, 2018).
Clinical significance can be used to advance EBP by determining whether the results of the study are meaningful to clinical practice in a way that the intervention that was tested, its effects are big enough to make the costs, any inconveniences, and harms worthwhile to improve clinical practice and patient care (Armijo-Olivo, 2018).
References:
Armijo-Olivo, S. (2018). The importance of determining the clinical significance of research results in physical therapy clinical research. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 22(3), 175-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.02.001
Heavey, E. (2015). Differentiating between statistical significance and clinical significance. American Nurse today, 10(5), 26-28. https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ant5-Research-421.pdf
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan – Rubric
Collapse All
Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
14.4 points
Criteria Description
Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
5. 5: Excellent
14.4 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Thorough explanations and vital supporting research are provided. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan NUR 590
4. 4: Good
13.25 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
12.67 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are summarized. More information is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.52 points
Some expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are only partially outlined.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are not discussed.
Data Collection Tools
12 points
Criteria Description
Data Collection Tools
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
A data collection tool is selected and a well-supported explanation for why the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable and would be effective for the research design is presented.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
A data collection tool is selected, and an explanation for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. An explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
A data collection tool is selected, and a summary for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. A general explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable, but more information and support are needed. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan NUR 590
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
A data collection tool is selected, but it is unclear why the tool would be effective for the research design. A valid, reliable, and applicable explanation for the tool is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A data collection tool is not discussed.
Statistical Test for Project
12 points
Criteria Description
Statistical Test for Project
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
A statistical test is selected, and a well-supported explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is clearly presented.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
A statistical test is selected, and an explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
A statistical test is selected, and a summary for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. More information or support is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
A statistical test is selected, but it is unclear why the test is best suited for the tool.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A statistical test is omitted.
Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
12 points
Criteria Description
Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection are thoroughly discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected are presented.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection are discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection are outlined. A summary of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. More information or support is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool partially discussed. It is unclear how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool are not discussed.
Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive
14.4 points
Criteria Description
Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive
5. 5: Excellent
14.4 points
Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
4. 4: Good
13.25 points
Clear and well-supported strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented.
3. 3: Satisfactory
12.67 points
General strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. More information and support are needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.52 points
Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are not discussed.
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution
13.2 points
Criteria Description
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution
5. 5: Excellent
13.2 points
Detailed and well-supported plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented.
4. 4: Good
12.14 points
Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
11.62 points
General plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. More information and support are needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
10.56 points
Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are not discussed.
Required Sources
6 points
Criteria Description
Required Sources
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
A number of required sources is met, but authorities are outdated or inappropriate.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The number of required sources is only partially met.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not included.
Thesis Development and Purpose
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. The thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. The thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The thesis is apparent and appropriate to the purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. The purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
9.6 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
A clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good
8.83 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
