Feb 23, 2024 LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
Contemporary Organization Change
The dynamism of the healthcare environment implies that healthcare organizations always have to the competence necessary to handle the complexity of the process. The process entails evaluating, planning, and executing operations, tactics, and strategies so as to make the change worthwhile. The complexity of the healthcare system alongside the need to constantly produce quality and safe healthcare services
means that healthcare organizations always face change events. The advent of evidence-based practice calling for the adoption of technology in various facets of healthcare has ensured that technology has disrupted the way facilities undertake matters. The present paper will thus examine the manner in which the University of Texas Medical has responded to technological disruption caused by EHR and its response to the change dynamics therein.
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: on LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
Organization and Change
The University of Texas Medical Branch consists of a healthcare system encompassing both research as well as emergency services on four of its campuses. The organization offers a network of specialty and primary care clinics, walk-in services and emergency care, as well as interprofessional collaboration entailing physicians and nurses among other healthcare professionals. The University of Texas Medical Branch has facilities that support both long-term and short-term care needs of numerous conditions from maternal issues to trauma cases (“Health care at UTMB”, n.d). The vast nature of the facilities comprising the UTMB demanded for the existence of a centralized way of addressing patient issues in terms of data leveraging. LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
UTMB provides itself in using advances in medicine to properly serve the Texas communities. In alignment with the above assertion, the facility currently responds to the healthcare disruptions caused by technology by adopting the use of electronic healthcare records to centralize patient data (Adler-Milstein et al., 2017). The UTMB purposes to ensure that it has a comprehensive EHR unit in all its facilities and clinical units. The desire to improve patient services and lead in evidence-based practice adoption by the UTMB has pushed it to embrace the technological disruption caused by EHR. By leveraging EHR and its innumerable benefits, the UMTB expects to improve the quality and safety of services that it offers to the Texas community. LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
Assessment Description
In today’s fast-paced and global community, most organizations are faced with constant change. Research contemporary organizations that are currently responding to a significant change within the industry, such as disruptive technology; state, government, or industry regulations; environmental constraints; judicial or legislative rulings; etc.
Choose one organization from your research that has recently responded to major change, or is currently responding to change. Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) discussing how well the organization is responding to the change dynamics. Include the following:
Describe the organization and the change to which it is responding. LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
Discuss the degree to which the change has been disruptive and how the organization has responded to the dynamics created by this change.
Evaluate the strategies the organization used in its change plan and determine the level of success the organization experienced with the strategies.
Determine the effect the change had on stakeholders, and to what degree stakeholders have resisted. Assess how well stakeholder resistance was addressed.
Evaluate the overall implications the change had on interdepartmental collaboration.
In your opinion, how well did the leaders of the organization respond and prepare for the change? What worked and what did not work with the strategies they implemented?
What modifications would you suggest the leaders of the organization make in order to better address the change dynamics? What additional strategies would you recommend to assist the organization through this change?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Contemporary Organization Evaluation
Digital technology is changing healthcare systems so rapidly that even organizations that are not rooted in digital services recognize that they need to respond and embrace technology’s disruptions. The contemporary healthcare consumers are more accustomed and networked to technology, a scenario that makes their lives speedier and easier. Stirred by other industries, healthcare organizations are beginning to embrace the application of technology in hospitals and medical research. Therefore, it is easy to envisage a unique health care world where there is the use of Artificial Intelligence (IA) that can analyze the patient population and undertake treatment processes (Laurenza, Quintano, Schiavone & Vrontis, 2018). United States hospitals and physicians still exist in the digital dark ages when it comes to the application of the newest computerized devices as well as the internet services to deliver healthcare services. As a result, United States hospitals are losing over 8.3 billion yearly in productivity and the increased patient discharges (Engelen, Jacobs, & Hulsebosch, 2018). On the other hand healthcare institutions continue to scuffle with the increased privacy and security concerns that result from the increased use of social media at a time when the government is imposing fines for the privacy violation. The use of technology to control healthcare services is, therefore, an essential factor that every institution needs to consider.
Organizational Description
Beaufort Memorial Hospital in the United States is one of the health care organizations that is responding to disruptive technology. The hospital provides surgical, medical, as well as therapeutic services in the Southern region of South Carolina, United States (Cooper & Collins, 2003). The health care institution is not-for-profit community hospital providing both inpatient and outpatient medical services. The hospital is a 200-bed capacity and offers services including cardiology, cancer treatment, mental health, emergency medicine, obstetrics and rehabilitation (Cooper & Collins, 2003). Most importantly, Beaufort Memorial Hospital in conjunction with the Duke University Health System operates the Keyserling Cancer Center. The hospital was started in the year 1944 (Cooper & Collins, 2003). Currently, the hospital is responding to the privacy concerns brought about by the increased use of social media. In recent years the hospital was fined for breaking the privacy policies that exposed medical conditions for various patients. Also, the hospital is responding to the communication challenges that have led to the loss of productivity and slow operational processes.
In the contemporary world, technology is compelling health care institutions to change how they approach their operational activities, how they interact with the patients, and who the people they interact with. Many traditional players in the healthcare systems such as Beaufort Memorial Hospital are struggling to keep up with the change. The prosperous healthcare institutions in future will be those that can adapt to the new technology or digital reality. When it comes to digital innovation, Beaufort Memorial Hospital presents a paradox (Cooper & Collins, 2003). In other words, in previous years, the organization was slow to embrace technology in the provision of services. While the breakthroughs in the use of technology are coming at a rapid rate, Beaufort Memorial Hospital found that operating within the traditional guidelines could not work. They were faced with the slow processes, losses and even lack of efficient treatment approaches. The discharges became slow and costly given the high number of both inpatient and outpatients. Among the essential players in the technology disruptions are patients. Beaufort Memorial Hospital was greatly impacted by the advanced choices created among the consumers. In other words, the patients had options of choosing their suitable delivery models, including home health, telemedicine, online-self-help, and concierge care. While Beaufort Memorial Hospital has a long way to go before becoming customer-centric, the technology offers options that consumers are looking for, including timely medical delivery, efficiency, convenience, and value.
Nature of Disruptions and Responses
To respond to the technological disruption, Beaufort Memorial Hospital is conducting major changes to embrace the application of digital technology in service provision. For instance, the hospital recently instigated the secure-texting system that enables medical professionals, nurses, and doctors to text and receive messages on their iPhones to enhance privacy and general business communication. The system encrypts all the messages and data delivered from one network to the other and, besides, stores them in an archive thus leading to increased privacy and security of patient’s information. The technology is not new as many organizations including those in the banking and manufacturing industries have been doing it for a long time. Beaufort Memorial Hospital is, therefore, responding by developing the corporate culture for applying them to enhance workflows and privacy issues. To respond to the privacy and security issues brought about by the technological disruption, Beaufort Memorial Hospital replaced the aging in-house network that forced caregivers to memorize numerous logins to access patients’ records from different departments.
Evaluation of Strategies
To address the issue of technological disruption, Beaufort Memorial Hospital employed different strategies to ensure maximum benefits from modern technology. First, the management ensured that all the workers, nurses, doctors, and all the stakeholders are ICT compliant. The hospital’s management conducted training programs so that all the workers understand the new systems and how to use them to increase workflow. The organization also developed a strong corporate culture geared towards improving individual attitudes towards the application of technology in the treatment process and other service delivery. Through doing away with paperwork and installing systems and networks that were able to support and connect all the workers, the organization was able to enhance communication system. Currently, the institution applies new visualized systems with the simple computing devices that are located in all nurses’ stations and all the rooms. Each medical staff has unique logins that can access the medical records of different patients.
The technological transformation brought a lot of changes both in the administrative and medical processes (In Weaver et al., 2016). There was an increase in efficiency in the discharge processes, bringing satisfaction to the patients and convenience to the nurses and doctors. The implementation of technology reduced the conflicting situation encounter between the government and the hospital administrations brought about by the privacy and security policies. Even though the implementation was successful the organization experienced antagonism from the medical professionals who not experienced in the use of new technology. Some workers resigned while other patients change their preferred facility as a result of the digital transformation. However, with the constant training and the creation of a strong corporate culture towards the new technology, the organization managed to realize the greater good in the end.
Overall Implications the Change On Interdepartmental
Collaboration
With the implementation of the digital transformation improved interdepartmental collaboration. With the connected environment, communication became easier. There was efficiency when it comes to access and to share patient records from one department to the other. With the development of mobile communication applications, the coordination became easier as nurses and doctors could easily share information. The new network improved the privacy issues among the medical professionals, a situation that greatly reduced the conflicts that used to originate from information disclosure. The federal government came up with a program called “Meaningful Use” that rewards doctors and nurses for demonstrating the increased application of electronic technology in organizing and operating medical records. The program has therefore created morale and improved collaboration among doctors from different departments within Beaufort Memorial Hospital. The above program is the hospital to adopt more digital technologies that can enhance or improve general healthcare delivery.
Response and Preparation for Change
Beaufort Memorial Hospital management effectively planned by organizing resources, manpower, and finance to ensure the success of digital migration. Through the medical tech experts the management managed to get elaborate and comprehensive information on the requirements and the implementation processes (Ringel, 2018). Also, the management managed to comply with the government regulations on the privacy policies and the security of the systems. The change became successful as a result of the engagement of all the stakeholders. In other words, the leadership managed to develop a collective responsibility whereby all the stakeholders were supposed 5o contribute to the change in one way or the other. The approaches employed in training medical professionals to gain efficiency in the use of the system worked well for Beaufort Memorial Hospital. However, the management was unable to convince patients who decided to change the facility due to the complexity brought about by the technological transformation.
Modifications
To better address the change dynamics, there is the need for the Beaufort Memorial Hospital’s management to continuously update the communication systems to keep up with the emerging threats that may threaten the privacy of both the medical professionals and the patients. With the changes in the systems, there is also the need for continuous training of the workforce in line with the new technologies. In addition to purchasing digital products, Beaufort Memorial Hospital needs to start developing its own systems in line with their services and the changing patient’s demands.
Assessment Description
In today’s fast-paced and global community, most organizations are faced with constant change. Research contemporary organizations that are currently responding to a significant change within the industry, such as disruptive technology; state, government, or industry regulations; environmental constraints; judicial or legislative rulings; etc. LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
Choose one organization from your research that has recently responded to major change, or is currently responding to change. Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) discussing how well the organization is responding to the change dynamics. Include the following:
Describe the organization and the change to which it is responding.
Discuss the degree to which the change has been disruptive and how the organization has responded to the dynamics created by this change.
Evaluate the strategies the organization used in its change plan and determine the level of success the organization experienced with the strategies.
Determine the effect the change had on stakeholders, and to what degree stakeholders have resisted. Assess how well stakeholder resistance was addressed.
Evaluate the overall implications the change had on interdepartmental collaboration.
In your opinion, how well did the leaders of the organization respond and prepare for the change? What worked and what did not work with the strategies they implemented?
What modifications would you suggest the leaders of the organization make in order to better address the change dynamics? What additional strategies would you recommend to assist the organization through this change?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
1. What types of obstacles/objections do leaders face from stakeholders when implementing change within an organization?
When implementing change within an organization, leaders often face various obstacles and objections from stakeholders. Resistance to change is one of the primary obstacles is resistance from stakeholders who may be hesitant or opposed to the proposed changes. People may resist change due to fear of the unknown, concerns about job security, or skepticism about the benefits of the change. Another is lack of understanding, which builds ambiguity among stakeholders causing them to object to the change if they do not fully understand its purpose, benefits, or potential impact. It is important for leaders to communicate clearly and provide detailed information about the reasons behind the change, how it aligns with the organization’s goals, and the expected outcomes. Those with seniority in their positions, supervisors/managers/leaders, may exhibit a feeling of loss of control and or power, may be hesitant to support change because they perceive it as a threat to their control or power within the organization. Change usually requires additional resources for implementation of change. These can be financial, technological, or human. Leaders need to carefully plan and allocate resources, demonstrate the potential return on investment, and address any resource concerns raised by stakeholder. Leaders sometimes have “inattentional blindness which is used to refer to a family of instances where we commonly fail to see plainly visible items even though we are looking directly at them because they are not expected” (Ellis, 2012). They think that their vision is so obvious that they fail to thoroughly explain it to those affected by the changes required to bring the vision into fruition.
2. What strategies can leaders use to work with stakeholders, remove obstacles, and address objections?
Leaders can employ several strategies to work with stakeholders, remove obstacles, and address objections when implementing change within an organization. The first is by effectively communicating and being open and transparent with stakeholders. Communication should be ongoing throughout the change process to keep stakeholders informed and engaged. Involve stakeholders in the change process from the beginning. “We need to highlight the importance of promoting the ethical dimension of change as a means of ensuring that leaders and their followers act in the interests of the many rather than the few” (By, et al, 2012). By involving stakeholders, leaders can address objections early on, gain valuable insights, and build support for the change. Identify influential stakeholders who can support and advocate for the change. Engage key stakeholders and involve them in shaping the change strategy, creating a shared vision, and addressing concerns from within their respective groups. Clearly articulate the expected benefits and positive outcomes of the change. Show stakeholders how the change aligns with the organization’s strategic goals and values. Continuously evaluate the progress and impact of the change initiative. Solicit feedback from stakeholders and make necessary adjustments based on their input.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
Resources
Collapse All
Backseat Leaders
Read “Backseat Leaders,” by Schlachter and Hildebrandt, from Leadership Excellence Essentials (2012).
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=82953867&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Group Imago and Group Development: Two Theoretical Additions and Some Ensuing Adjustments
Read “Group Imago and Group Development: Two Theoretical Additions and Some Ensuing Adjustments,” by Tudor, from Transactiona
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2014-04423-008&site=ehost-live&scope=site. LDR 615 Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay
May I Have Your Attention Please? A Review of Change Blindness
Read “May I Have Your Attention Please? A Review of Change Blindness,” by Ellis, from Organization Development Journal (
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=94475438&site=ehost-live&scope=site
The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations
Read Chapter/Step 6 in The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations.
View Resource
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
