Feb 23, 2024 NR 361 Week 2 Assignment Recent
NR 361 Week 2 Assignment Recent
NR 361 Week 2 Assignment Recent
Patient Guide to the WWW Presentation
Directions: Prior to completing this template, carefully review Course Project Milestone 1 Guidelines. After saving the document to your computer, type your answers directly on this template and save again. This assignment is due by Sunday end of Week 2 by 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time.
Assignment Criteria NOTE: See Milestone 1 Rubric for details required in each area.Scenario for Milestone Assignment: Scenario is clear and concise, including a disease process, diagnosis, OR identify a patient with a desire to maintain good health and prevent illness. Include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn. 50 points Elliot Jackson – 62years old African American male.Mr Elliot smokes 1pack of cigerrette in a week, obese and have a family history of hypertension and diabetes. He works as a clerk in the hospital sohe spent most of his days at work sitting down. He does not exercise much and eat fast food . The patient recently diagnosed with Hypertension. He was admitted in the hospital for observation. After high blood pressure medication prescription, the patient ask to know what else he can do to help him maintain his blood pressure and what is the risk in having a prolong blood pressure. Education: Describe in detail contentplanned forteaching this patient in the scenario. 40 pointsThis plan will be made in order to meet the needs of the patient. Encouraging the patient to be engaged with physical exercises such as walking or jogging as tolerated. He can eat health balanced diet. Take his blood pressure before taking his medication. Stop smoking cigarrette Advise the patient that he is at risk of Haemorrhagic stroke Thrombotic stroke Embolic stroke Angina pectoris involving coronary arterioles Occlusive epicardial coronary arterial diseases Congestive heart failure Left ventricular diastolic dysfunctionKidney Renal arterial disease End-stage renal disease Embolic renal disease Exacerbation of diabetic renal disease Hypertension : An Atlas of Investigation and Management Frohlich, Edward D.; Ventura, Hector O. Oxford, UK : Clinical Publishing. 2009. eBook., Database: eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) Identify the mHealth application: Identify a mHealth app that could benefit the patient. Describe the app including the mHealth app name, purpose, intended audience, mobile device(s) upon which it will operate, where to download or obtain it. Include a working link if it is to be downloaded from a website. Add any other information you believe would be pertinent to this situation. Make sure to add a citation for this mHealth app in APA format. points There is so much mHealth to use but i will introduce Blood Pressure app by Klimaszewski Szymon to the patient. It can be downloade free on the google store.it is very friendly and easy to use.The patient can save, edit or update his measurement The app will describe your records, date and time of BP measurement,the values (systolic, diastolic, pulse and weight of the patient) The app will describe MAP (Mean Arterial Pressure), Pulse Pressure,24h average, Blood Pressure chart ,comparison of different time periods. The app can also export data like CSV, PDF of detailed blood pressure reports ,blood pressure graphs and statistics from app that can be sent to the physician. The app remain user take blood pressure daily to be able to monitor monitor blood pressure on a daily basis. It help the user to decide what blood pressure data the application will show, analyse or export! It is easy for the user to customise the appearance of the application to his needs. There is light and dark theme for people with visual issues. There is customizable colors for values of systolic, diastolic, pulse and weight. Especially useful for color blind users. It backups all the patient’s blood pressure data, so no need to worry about loosing them. References K.Szymon,Blood Pressure https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.szyk.myheart&hl=en_US. Updated June 29, 2020 Statement from instructor on required assignment and topic: Accepted,Accepted with revisions needed, ORNot accepted. *Any required revision will not alter your grade for this assignment. * AcceptedAccepted with revisionsNot accepted
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 361 Week 2 Assignment Recent done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
NR 361 Week 2 Assignment Recent
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 361 Week 2 Assignment Recent
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.
Also Read: DQ 2: AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results
Participation: RN-to-BSN
In discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
1. Attendance
Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.
2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions
PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:
Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
Integrate scholarly resources
Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.
Participation points: It is expected that you will meet the minimum participation requirement described above. If not:
You will receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if your response to the initial question is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
You will also receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if you do not post at least three (3) times in each thread on at least two (2) separate days.
3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
4. Participation Guidelines
You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.
5. Grading Rubric
Discussion Criteria
A(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance
B(87%)Very good or high level of performance
C(76%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance
F(0)Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.16 points
Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.
16 points
Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.
14 points
Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.
12 points
Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).
0 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.*( APA format not required)12 points
Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:
assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND
at least one outside scholarly source.***
Sources are credited.*
12 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion from:
assigned readings OR online lesson.
Sources are credited.*
10 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson.
Sources are credited.*
9 points
Does not integrate any evidence.
0 points
Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.14 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.
14 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.
12 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.
10 points
No response post to another student or instructor.
0 points
Communicates in a professional manner.8 points
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
8 points
Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
7 points
Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
6 points
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
0 points
PARTICIPATION:Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) byWednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
0 points lost
Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.
-5 points
Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.
PARTICIPATIONTotal posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.
0 points lost
Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.
-5 points
Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.
NOTES:* Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.
** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
*** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.
NOTE: A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
