Feb 23, 2024 NR 361 Week 4 Information Systems Paper
NR 361 Week 4 Information Systems Paper
NR 361 Week 4 Information Systems Paper
What are the pros and cons of the situation in the case study?
The implementation of EHRS in the medical field has provided many benefits for both patients and providers. This long list of benefits includes improved safety, easier access to a patient’s chart which allows for faster care, and improved control over health information for the consumer (Hebda and Hunter, 2019). There are many pros to this scenario. I would like to highlight the efficiency aspect that the patient can review the information received by their healthcare provider as quickly as they can log in. The information can be reviewed multiple times for the patient to obtain a better understanding of their results and condition. The patient can easily share accurate information with the family and other providers. The patient’s ability to recollect what has been said to them by the provider may be altered for many reasons so the PHR is a great place to review. The PHR can be a reminder for symptoms that need to be reported, follow-up appointments, and new questions that may arise after the provider contact. In general, a tool to promote patient involvement. The greatest con to the scenario is that the patient was not able to access all their information in one place. As explained by (Lester M, Boateng S, Studeny J, and Coustasse A), some standards support interoperability and have started to take hold in the realm of PHRs. Blue Button and direct secure messaging are two such examples that have been incorporated into many PHR systems (2016). I am surprised by all the ways technology has advanced that we are not all using a system to universally integrate the different EHR’s. If this were the case it would make the patient experience more complete and the usability of the PHR more meaningful.
What safeguards are included inpatient portals and PHRs to help patients and healthcare professionals ensure safety?
There are many safeguards in place to help both patients and healthcare providers. When accessing a PHR there are security questions, PINs, and MRN numbers that are specific to the patient. The providers entering information also have passcodes specific to them when entering information so this data can be traced back to the author. These safeguards not only help keep information confidential but also accurate.
Do you agree or disagree with the way that a patient obtains Personal Health Records (PHRs)?
I agree with the right of a patient to have access to their information. As we develop and improve upon the PHR it will become more useful and effective for this objective. Allowing a patient to review their records can help them gain better insight into their health. This can allow them to develop questions for the next visit and help them be better informed regarding decisions and the direction of their care.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 361 Week 4 Information Systems Paper done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
What are the challenges for patients that do not have access to all the PHRs?
Remember, only portions of the EHRs are typically included in the PHRs. The great challenges for patients not being able to access all their information revolve around them not seeing the complete picture. It will be hard for them to understand a holistic approach to healthcare decision-making if they do not see all the pieces of the puzzle. If information is not in the PHR then it is the healthcare provider’s responsibility to inform and explain what is missing. I have had patients pull all this information together into spreadsheets. They bring the spreadsheets with them when they are admitted to the hospital and it makes the admission process much more efficient and smoother. This affects the quality of care and patient satisfaction in their stay.
References
Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of informatics for nurses & healthcare professionals (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Lester M, Boateng S, Studeny J, and Coustasse A, (April 2016) Personal Health Records: Beneficial or Burdensome for Patients and Healthcare Providers? Retrieved July 27, 2020, from https://chamberlain-on-worldcat-org.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/oclc/6031930212
Week 4: Information Systems Paper
Information Systems in Healthcare Paper Guidelines (graded,200 points)
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to select a topic relatedto information systems in healthcare from the list provided, research andanalyze the topic, and describe how you will apply your newfound knowledge toyour nursing practice.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet one or more ofthe following Course Outcomes depending on the topic selected.
CO 1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate toaddress the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO 1)
CO 2: Analyze data from all relevant sources, includingtechnology, to inform the delivery of care. (PO 2)
CO 3: Define standardized terminology that reflectsnursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO 3)
CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making supporttools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to supporta safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4)
CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, informationsystems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO 5)
CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professionalethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatoryrequirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)
CO 7: Examine the use of information systems to documentinterventions related to achieving nurse sensitive outcomes. (PO 7)
CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving forceto institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)
Points
This assignment is worth a total of 200 points.
Rubric
Click to download the NR361 Information Systems Paper Rubric(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Due Date
Your completed paper is due in Week 4. Be sure to submityour assignment. Post your questions to the Q & A Forum. Contact yourinstructor if you need additional assistance. See the Course Policies regardinglate assignments and academic integrity. Failure to submit your paper on timewill result in a deduction of points.
Topics
Select one of these topics for the focus of your paper.
Personal Health Records (CO5, CO6, CO8)
Usability, Integration, and Interoperability in HealthcareTechnology (CO2, CO3, CO6)
Directions
You are to research, analyze, and write anAPA-formattedscholarly paper on ONE topic from the two choices listed below.Once selected, please click on the link next to the topic to download an APAtemplate to complete your paper.
Personal Health Records (APA template) (Links to an externalsite.)Links to an external site. (CO5, CO6, CO8) OR
Usability, Integration, and Interoperability in HealthcareTechnology (APA template) (Links to an external site.)Links to an externalsite. (CO2, CO3, CO6)
Use the template to write an introduction that defines anddescribes the topic. Address what purpose the topic serves and how it impactsthe delivery of healthcare in general and nursing care in particular.
Search for scholarly sources and relevant websites. Includea minimum of two scholarly sources. The course textbook does not qualify as ascholarly source. Cite all sources in the body of the paper and include them inthe References list following proper APA formatting.
Provide one example of this topic. Describe the mainfeatures or aspects of the example with support from your sources.
Describe an experience where the topic impacted youpersonally, either when you were receiving healthcare or when you wereproviding nursing care.Relate one positive aspect or one negative aspect ofthis experience and how it could have been improved.
Write a conclusion that summarizes the topic, the purpose,and how your newfound insight will influence your nursing care.
Use one of the APA templates above to develop your paper.Use APA formatting. Refer to the Publication manual of the APA, sixth edition.Review the various APA documents included in this course and the SSPRNBSNStudent Success course that can help you with your writing. Take advantage ofthe tutoring services that are available to Chamberlain students for free.
The length of the paper should be a maximum of 4-5 pages,excluding the title page and the reference page. There should only be one smallquote maximum in the paper. Citations should primarily include summary andrestatement.
NR361 Week6 Interview With a Nurse Information Expert Latest 2018 January
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to
communicateyour understanding of the importance of quality information in everydaynursing practice;
discussthe roles and responsibilities of a nursing information expert; and
articulatehow the professional nurse uses information and data in everyday practiceto improve outcomes.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following CourseOutcomes.
CO 1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to addressthe needs of a diverse patient population. (PO 1)
CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support toolsembedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safepractice environment for both patients and healthcare workers.
CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force toinstitute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)
Points
This assignment is worth a total of 225 points.
Due Date
This assignment, Interview With a Nursing Information Expert, isdue in Week 6.Post questions to the Q & A Forum. Contact your instructor ifyou need additional assistance.See the Policies regarding late assignments. Failure to submityour paper on time will result in a deduction of points.Be sure to submit yourassignment.
Directions
Downloadthe NR361 Interview Form (Links to an external site.)Links to an externalsite., which will be used to complete this assignment.
Selectyour interviewee and schedule an interview. This individual must be aRegistered Nurse. Jobtitles of RNs who may be considered include, but are not limited to,nursing clinical information manager, super user, director/managerclinical education, chief information officer, quality assurance orperformance improvement nurse, nurse informaticist, telenursingspecialist, nurse abstractor, case manager, or compliance nurse.Ifyou have any concerns about whether the RN is suitable for thisassignment, contact your instructor before you schedule the interview.
Reviewall questions (areas of inquiry) on the Interview Form prior to conductingthe interview. You may print the form and take it with you to theinterview.
Notethat there are five required questions to ask the RN.
Notethat there are four optional questions. You need to select only one ofthese to ask the RN.
Notethat there are two follow-up questions you must answer.
Prior to conducting your interview, review two scholarlyresources. These resources should guide your understanding of the RN’s role andresponsibilities or make you more knowledgeable about GIGO, interprofessionalcommunication, or other key concepts in the questions that you may not fullyunderstand. For example, if your interviewee is a telenurse, you would want toreview information on this specialty. If you do not know what GIGO means, lookit up.
Conductyour interview. The length of your interview will vary but should notexceed 1 hour.
Submitthe completed interview form prior to the deadline outlined above.
Criteria for Content
Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
Criteria for Content
Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer
NR 361 Week 4 Information Systems Paper
to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 361 Week 4 Information Systems Paper
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate
program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
Also Check Out: NR 361 Week 2 Patient Education Technology Guide to a Mobile Health Application PowerPoint Purpose
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
Graded Item
Points
Weighting
Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8)
375
37.5%
Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3)
200
20%
Management of Power Paper (Week 5)
200
20%
Executive Summary (Week 7)
225
22.5%
Total
1,000
100%
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
Letter Grade
Points
Percentage
A
940–1,000
94% to 100%
A-
920–939
92% to 93%
B+
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
