Feb 23, 2024 NR 439 Week 5 Discussion, Data Collection and Measurement
NR 439 Week 5 Discussion, Data Collection and Measurement
But I would like to disagree with you regarding your explanation of Psychometric method. Your example of evaluating the number of readmissions in relation to patients that receive 48-hour post discharge calls falls under secondary data instead of primary data because it is coming from an outside source. Primary data are recorded by the researcher from a subject, and the researcher uses specific rules to obtain and retain the a record of the responses (Houser, 2018). Thermometers, digital cameras, pain rating scales are some examples of tools that can be used to collect measures involving primary data. Your example seems to be that of a secondary data, because they’re coming from outside sources. In most cases the reliability and validity of secondary data is questioned. One way to check if the secondary data is reliable and valid, is by making sure that the data is clear and consistent and unbiased. Physiologic measurements are used for the collection of objective data (primary data), while psychometric measurements are used for the collection of subjective data (secondary data). I think your example falls under secondary data.(psychometric measurements). Thanks
References
Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
The American Nurses Association (ANA) released a report in 2014 to share the growth, salaries, educational level, demographics and trends across the nursing profession. Since the data listed was retrieved from other sources, it is considered secondary data. “Secondary data can reveal important relationships and offer a good way to retrieve data efficiently and effectively” (Houser, 2018). Julie, when you are looking for patients that did not receive post discharge phone calls, would that be a chart review? Would you consider that secondary data? Dr Joy
American Nurses Association. (2014). Fast facts: The nursing workforce 2014: Growth, salaries, education, demographics & trends. Retrieved from http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/workforce/Fast-Facts-2014-Nursing-Workforce.pdf
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 439 Week 5 Discussion, Data Collection and Measurement done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
Class, the tools that we use to collect data need to be reliable and valid. Define these terms with respect to research and explain why they are important.We will be working on the following: 2 Course OutComes:CO(s) to which it is mapped:CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO: 4, 8)CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO: 4, 8)Consider data collection and measure methods as you read the following online or after you download it.American Nurses Association. (2014). Fast facts: The nursing workforce 2014: Growth, salaries, education, demographics & trends. Retrieved from http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/workforce/Fast-Facts-2014-Nursing-Workforce.pdf1. Review these facts and describe what the results say about this sample of the nursing workforce. 2.What do you believe was the intent of the researcher who designed the survey?
3. Define these terms with respect to research, and explain why they are important. 4.Consider data collection and measurement methods for your nursing clinical issue. Explain how you would collect data and what measurement methods you would use.
When doing research and presenting information, it is always imperative to use data that is considered valid and reliable. The term valid is defined as “well-grounded or justifiable: being at once relevant and meaningful” (Merriam-Webster.com, 2017). Information that is considered valid, is information believed to be precise and accurate. When information is considered to be reliable, it is known to be true/ factual with data to prove so. If there is ever any doubt I the validity and reliability in the information being presented, the confidence in the study is devalued.
After reviewing the designated study, the intent of the researcher seems to be to give information on the nursing profession using data from actual nurses highlighting both positive and negative data. The data collection method used in this study was psychometric which uses scales and survey. According to this week’s lesson, “Variables must be expressed as numbers in order to analyze them statistically, but different types of numbers have different levels of measurement” (Chamberlain, 2017). The measurement method used is the nominal level of measurement presenting categorized data such as age, gender, salaries, etc.
When collecting data for my nursing clinical issue, I would also use the psychometric method by evaluating the number of readmissions in relation to patients that receive 48- hour post discharge calls. The measurement method I would use is ratio showing a decrease in readmissions of newly diagnosed HF patients with 48-hour post discharge phone calls. I would collect data by locating newly diagnosed HF patients, administer 48-hour post discharge call, and monitor readmission rates of designated patients within a 30-day period for 3 months at a time. I would then compare the data against HF patients that never received 48-hour post discharge calls and the rate of readmission.
Thank you,
References
Chamberlain College of Nursing (CCN). (2017). NR-439- Week 5 Lecture: Reading Research Implementing the Study, Data Collection Methods [Online lesson]. Downers Grove, IL: DeVry Education Group
Valid. (n.d.). Retrieved August 1, 2017, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/valid
NR 439 Week 5 Discussion, Data Collection and Measurement
When doing research and presenting information, it is always imperative to use data that is considered valid and reliable. The term valid is defined as “well-grounded or justifiable: being at once relevant and meaningful” (Merriam-Webster.com, 2017). Information that is considered valid, is information believed to be precise and accurate. When information is considered to be reliable, it is known to be true/ factual with data to prove so. If there is ever any doubt I the validity and reliability in the information being presented, the confidence in the study is devalued.
After reviewing the designated study, the intent of the researcher seems to be to give information on the nursing profession using data from actual nurses highlighting both positive and negative data. The data collection method used in this study was psychometric which uses scales and survey. According to this week’s lesson, “Variables must be expressed as numbers in order to analyze them statistically, but different types of numbers have different levels of measurement” (Chamberlain, 2017). The measurement method used is the nominal level of measurement presenting categorized data such as age, gender, salaries, etc.
When collecting data for my nursing clinical issue, I would also use the psychometric method by evaluating the number of readmissions in relation to patients that receive 48- hour post discharge calls. The measurement method I would use is ratio showing a decrease in readmissions of newly diagnosed HF patients with 48-hour post discharge phone calls. I would collect data by locating newly diagnosed HF patients, administer 48-hour post discharge call, and monitor readmission rates of designated patients within a 30-day period for 3 months at a time. I would then compare the data against HF patients that never received 48-hour post discharge calls and the rate of readmission.
the tools that we use to collect data need to be reliable and valid. Define these terms with respect to research and explain why they are important.
We will be working on the following: 2 Course OutComes:
CO(s) to which it is mapped:
CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO: 4, 8)
CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO: 4, 8)
Consider data collection and measure methods as you read the following online or after you download it.
American Nurses Association. (2014). Fast facts: The nursing workforce 2014: Growth, salaries, education, demographics & trends. Retrieved from http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/workforce/Fast-Facts-2014-Nursing-Workforce.pdf
1. Review these facts and describe what the results say about this sample of the nursing workforce.2.What do you believe was the intent of the researcher who designed the survey?
Define these terms with respect to research, and explain why they are important.
4.Consider data collection and measurement methods for your nursing clinical issue. Explain how you would collect data and what measurement methods you would use.Dr Joy
Review these facts, and describe what the results say about this sample of the nursing workforce.
What do you believe was the intent of the researcher who designed the survey?
The next process for our study is to collect data. The research design will indicate the best data to be collected. The tools that we use to collect data need to be reliable and valid. Define these terms with respect to research, and explain why they are important.
Consider data collection and measurement methods for your nursing clinical issue. Explain how you would collect data and what measurement methods you would use.
Participation: RN-to-BSN
In discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
1. Attendance
Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.
NR 439 Week 5 Discussion, Data Collection and Measurement
2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions
PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:
Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
Integrate scholarly resources
Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 439 Week 5 Discussion, Data Collection and Measurement
Participation points: It is expected that you will meet the minimum participation requirement described above. If not:
You will receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if your response to the initial question is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
You will also receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if you do not post at least three (3) times in each thread on at least two (2) separate days.
3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
4. Participation Guidelines
You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.
5. Grading Rubric
Discussion Criteria
A(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance
B(87%)Very good or high level of performance
C(76%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance
F(0)Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.16 points
Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.
16 points
Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.
14 points
Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.
12 points
Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).
0 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.*( APA format not required)12 points
Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:
assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND
at least one outside scholarly source.***
Sources are credited.*
12 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion from:
assigned readings OR online lesson.
Sources are credited.*
10 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson.
Sources are credited.*
9 points
Does not integrate any evidence.
0 points
Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.14 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.
14 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.
12 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.
10 points
No response post to another student or instructor.
0 points
Communicates in a professional manner.8 points
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
8 points
Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
7 points
Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
6 points
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
0 points
PARTICIPATION:Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) byWednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
0 points lost
Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.
-5 points
Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.
PARTICIPATIONTotal posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.
0 points lost
Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.
-5 points
Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.
NOTES:* Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.
** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
*** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.
NOTE: A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
