Feb 23, 2024 NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling
NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling
NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling
Quantitative research is objective in nature and based on data that can be measured and analyzed statistically (Polit & Beck, 2017). The quantitative design looks at a topic of interest and researches how data changes once a variable or intervention is introduced. In a quantitative study, the researcher is concerned with cause and effect and looks at how often and to what extent society is impacted as a result of the situation in question. An advantage of this research design is the use of positivist paradigm which Polit (2017), describes as understanding the natural causes behind a phenomenon. Rahman (2017), speaks to positivist paradigm as an advantage to the quantitative study because objectivity is obtained when the person and reality are separated. The quantitative research design also utilizes a larger sample of the general population which makes data analysis much easier with the use of statistical software (Rahman, 2017). The use of a larger sample helps to ensure an accurate representation of the population is being studied and analyzed. An accurate representation allows the researcher to formulate interventions that could benefit a larger population. A disadvantage to this research design is tight control over the research parameters of the study and a narrow vision focused on objectivity (Polit, 2017). The positivist paradigm fails to connect the phenomena with its effect on the individual by incorporating personal experience within the situation. Utilization of a larger sample can simply look at a “snap-shot in time” and fail to reflect how the social reality is shaped and maintained through feelings and emotions over a period of time (Rahman, 2017). Quantitative research is less personal and removes the emotional aspect from the human perspective.
Qualitative research is subjective in nature and deals with feelings and thought from real life experiences (Polit, 2017). Qualitative research looks at information from the human perspective and gathers data accordingly. The researcher is concerned with how the phenomena affected the person emotionally and relies heavily on the participant expressing their honest view of the circumstances. Qualitative research is usually on topics with very little information or known facts in circulation. An advantage to this research design is the information provides a deeper view into the thoughts, feelings, and actions of a participant when experiencing a certain phenomenon (Rahman, 2017). Culture norms are shaped by individuals expressing themselves and qualitative research can be instrumental in understanding how participants think. The sample size in qualitative research is usually smaller because they rely on key informants who are knowledgeable with lived experience of a certain phenomena (Polit, 2017). A disadvantage to this research design is researchers tend to focus on participants with expertise experience and can discount many testimonies within a general population placing limitations on the study’s findings because a true representation of the population is not observed (Rahman, 2017). Many researchers encountered negative bias with qualitative research due to the smaller sample sizes and the subjectivity of the data which relies on participants experiences rather than imperative information on the subject (Rahman, 2017).
Polit, D. & Beck, C. (2017). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Rahman, M. S. (2017). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “Testing and Assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102-112.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling:
Research is categorized as quantitative or qualitative in nature. Quantitative research employs the use of numbers and accuracy while qualitative research focuses on lived experiences and human perception (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). There are some advantages and disadvantages to both forms of research queries. The common goal of both is to conclude with positive, well-designed results that promotes change or introduces an intervention that is accurate and useful.
Control over Study Conditions Research Approach: Advantage
Quantitative
One advantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is the way the data is collected. One form of research method that is used is the use of surveys for collection of data. With the use of surveys, data can be analyzed in an easy and fast manner, therefore consumption of time is less. The quantitative research approach consists of less time consumption, which allows a large amount of data to be collected.
Qualitative
Qualitative research allows gathering of more in-depth data. Its use of in-depth, one-on-one interviews allows gaining a better understanding of collected data, thus allowing a better understanding of complex situations (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).
Control over Study Conditions Qualitative Research Approach: Disadvantage
Quantitative
A disadvantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is that research is less in-depth. The observation of collected data and pertinent information can be overlooked with this form of research. The results can become vague and useless to the research. This may cause a waste of time and resources, if the data is not reviewed for the intended outcome and accuracy.
Qualitative
A disadvantage of qualitative is its low credibility due to an inability to quantify predictors (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). For example, the inability to give percentages of an unwarranted event’s chance of reoccurrence in the future.
Extending or Generalizing results from a sample or larger group or population with quantitative research approach:
Advantage:
Because quantitative research uses a larger population, a larger volume of data is collected, a broader study can be made with more subjects to be reviewed, thus allowing more generalization to occur (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).
Disadvantage:
The results are based on quantity and most participants will not offer much insight into their thoughts, causing a lack of reliable context (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).
Extending or Generalizing results from a sample or larger group or population with qualitative research approach:
Advantage:
Qualitative usually collects data through one –on –one interviews, focus groups, and discussions (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018). The sample sizes are smaller allowing for a more in-depth collection of data to be utilized for research.
Disadvantage:
The use of a smaller sample size makes it difficult for this research method to generalize the results of the qualitative study.
Reference
Rutberg, S., & Boukidis, C.D. (2018). Exploring the Evidence. Focusing on the Fundamentals: A Simplistic Differentiation Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), 209-213
Because of the emphasis on qualitative design and sampling, this is an excellent opportunity to compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative research approaches. Apply information that considers one advantage and one disadvantage for each of the following areas: control over study conditions with the quantitative research approach; control over study conditions with the qualitative research approach; extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the quantitative research approach; and extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the qualitative research approach.
Include scholarly references to back up your claims FOR NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling.
SAMPLE NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling
The nature of research is classified as quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative research relies on numbers and precision, whereas qualitative research is concerned with lived experiences and human perception (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). Both types of research queries have advantages and disadvantages. Both have the same goal in mind: to produce positive, well-designed outcomes that promote change or introduce an intervention that is accurate and useful.
Control over Research Conditions Approach to Research: Benefits
Quantitative
The method by which data is collected is one advantage of having control over study conditions with a quantitative research approach. Surveys are one type of research method that is used to collect data. Data can be analyzed quickly and easily with the help of surveys, resulting in a reduction in time consumption. The quantitative research approach requires less time, allowing for the collection of a large amount of data.
Qualitative
Qualitative research allows for the collection of more detailed data. Its use of in-depth, one-on-one interviews allows for a better understanding.
understanding of data collected, allowing for a better understanding of complex situations (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).
Control over Research Conditions Approach to Qualitative Research: Disadvantage
Quantitative
One disadvantage of using a quantitative research approach to control study conditions is that the research is less in-depth. With this type of research, it is easy to overlook the observation of collected data and pertinent information. The results may become hazy and ineffective for the research. If the data is not reviewed for intended outcome and accuracy, this may result in a waste of time and resources.
Qualitative
One disadvantage of qualitative research is its lack of credibility as a result of the inability to quantify predictors (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). For example, the inability to provide percentages of the likelihood of an unwarranted event recurring in the future.
Discussion in NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling RESPONSE EXAMPLE
Your post comparing and contrasting quantitative and qualitative research approaches wowed me.
In terms of control over sample conditions for both qualitative and quantitative research methods, your discussion board post was clear and concise.
You ensured that your scholarly information was easily understood by breaking down your findings about both qualitative and quantitative extension/generalization of results. I believe your intended message was received favorably by all who read it. Obviously, you chose an excellent reference article. I believe that by preparing this assignment, we will have a better, more in-depth understanding of which research approach will be more relevant to our personal area of interest. I’m a little nervous about preparing this project, but I know that the knowledge I gain from each week’s lesson will improve my research skills and add to my overall knowledge. I’m looking forward to reading more of your posts in the future.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
Include in-text citations in your response
Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
Follow APA-7th edition
Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
Follow APA 7th edition
Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
Here are some helpful links
Student paper example
Citing Sources
The Writing Center is a great resource
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
Performance Category
10
9
8
4
0
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category
10
9
8
4
0
Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category
5
4
3
2
0
Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.
(5 points possible per graded thread)
Exceeds minimum post requirements
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
Replies to a question posed by a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
Has only one post for the week
Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
Does not post to the thread
No connections are made to the topic
Minus 1 Point
Minus 2 Point
Minus 3 Point
Minus 4 Point
Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
2-3 errors in APA format.
Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
4-5 errors in APA
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
