Feb 23, 2024 NURS 6050 Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists
NURS 6050 Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists NURS 6050 Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists Technology specialists within our organization play a key role in daily operations. “Nursing informatics is a specialty that integrates nursing science, computer science, and information science to manage and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice” (McGonigle et al., 2018, p. 141). In the operating room department, we have chart auditors, data analysts, and quality improvement specialists. Data that is closely monitored by these individuals include nurse charting and patient charges, surgical site infections, patient injuries, and improvement projects. These specialists continually monitor charting and patient care within our department. They gather information and analyze it to provide education or improvements where they are needed. One of the current strategies we use to communicate charting errors is through a whiteboard. The chart auditors will write specific notes to individuals and hang them in their offices. Once a note has been created the nurse’s name is added to the whiteboard by the front desk to make them aware they have something within a patient chart to fix. More times than not these corrections go unnoticed by staff for extended periods. One way I would suggest improving this would be to integrate an electronic form of notification. We are assigned phones while we are at work, this system allows text and notifications to be sent out. If the auditors were to send communication via the phone I believe it would be more effective in communicating. Technology has proven to be the way of the future. It is become rare to see any other forms of communication being used. I feel that a person would be more apt to look at their phone notification than at the whiteboard. This would prompt earlier correction of errors within the EHR (electronic healthcare record) ensuring patients received effective and cost-efficient care. Struggling to Meet Your Deadline? Get your assignment on NURS 6050 Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW! Meet my deadline The continued evolution of nursing informatics will continue to become more important to healthcare. I can see this having a negative and positive effect on professional interactions. Since the development of the EHR we have already seen the potential for patient personal information to be accessed by outside individuals. Since the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) privacy protection measures have been mandated on institutions to protect patient information (McGonigle et al., 2018). Though these regulations were instated we still hear about breaks in the system that cause patient information to be leaked. With advancements in informatics we see fewer of these cases but living in the digital world there is always a risk of this happening. A positive outcome of the evolution of informatics would be access to patient information across a healthcare team, continuity of care is what comes to mind. Continuity of care encompasses the quality of care given to a patient over time by their healthcare team (Gulliford et al., 2006). EHR allows patient information to be stored and accessed easily between healthcare professionals. When a patient seeks medical care outside of their primary care provider’s scope, access to pertinent treatment and health history is needed for proper treatment. Patients also benefit from having access to their own EHR in order to advocate for themselves and to have access to records to share with other healthcare professionals (Hoover, 2017). As EHR technologies continue to advance and communication between systems improves barriers to this pertinent patient information will diminish. The advancements that have already been made in nursing informatics and technology have already changed the world of healthcare. As we continue to grow as a profession and continue to advance these technologies will impact patient care in positive ways. Allowing patients to get the care they need and healthcare professionals access to patient information that they need to provide care. Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive. Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients. In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved. To Prepare: Review the Resources and reflect on the evolution of nursing informatics from a science to a nursing specialty. Consider your experiences with nurse Informaticists or technology specialists within your healthcare organization. By Day 3 of Week 3 Post a description of experiences or observations about how nurse informaticists and/or data or technology specialists interact with other professionals within your healthcare organization. Suggest at least one strategy on how these interactions might be improved. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain the impact you believe the continued evolution of nursing informatics as a specialty and/or the continued emergence of new technologies might have on professional interactions. Technology specialists within our organization play a key role in daily operations. “Nursing informatics is a specialty that integrates nursing science, computer science, and information science to manage and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice” (McGonigle et al., 2018, p. 141). In the operating room department, we have chart auditors, data analysts, and quality improvement specialists. Data that is closely monitored by these individuals include nurse charting and patient charges, surgical site infections, patient injuries, and improvement projects. These specialists continually monitor charting and patient care within our department. They gather information and analyze it to provide education or improvements where they are needed. One of the current strategies we use to communicate charting errors is through a whiteboard. The chart auditors will write specific notes to individuals and hang them in their offices. Once a note has been created the nurse’s name is added to the whiteboard by the front desk to make them aware they have something within a patient chart to fix. More times than not these corrections go unnoticed by staff for extended periods. One way I would suggest improving this would be to integrate an electronic form of notification. We are assigned phones while we are at work, this system allows text and notifications to be sent out. If the auditors were to send communication via the phone I believe it would be more effective in communicating. Technology has proven to be the way of the future. It is become rare to see any other forms of communication being used. I feel that a person would be more apt to look at their phone notification than at the whiteboard. This would prompt earlier correction of errors within the EHR (electronic healthcare record) ensuring patients received effective and cost-efficient care. The continued evolution of nursing informatics will continue to become more important to healthcare. I can see this having a negative and positive effect on professional interactions. Since the development of the EHR we have already seen the potential for patient personal information to be accessed by outside individuals. Since the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) privacy protection measures have been mandated on institutions to protect patient information (McGonigle et al., 2018). Though these regulations were instated we still hear about breaks in the system that cause patient information to be leaked. With advancements in informatics we see fewer of these cases but living in the digital world there is always a risk of this happening. A positive outcome of the evolution of informatics would be access to patient information across a healthcare team, continuity of care is what comes to mind. Continuity of care encompasses the quality of care given to a patient over time by their healthcare team (Gulliford et al., 2006). EHR allows patient information to be stored and accessed easily between healthcare professionals. When a patient seeks medical care outside of their primary care provider’s scope, access to pertinent treatment and health history is needed for proper treatment. Patients also benefit from having access to their own EHR in order to advocate for themselves and to have access to records to share with other healthcare professionals (Hoover, 2017). As EHR technologies continue to advance and communication between systems improves barriers to this pertinent patient information will diminish. The advancements that have already been made in nursing informatics and technology have already changed the world of healthcare. As we continue to grow as a profession and continue to advance these technologies will impact patient care in positive ways. Allowing patients to get the care they need and healthcare professionals access to patient information that they need to provide care. By Day 6 of Week 3 Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, offering one or more additional interaction strategies in support of the examples/observations shared or by offering further insight to the thoughts shared about the future of these interactions. *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues. The world of nursing relies on efficient and current innovative data and technology to keep patient outcomes optimal. A prime example of how technology specialists interact with the health care team would be an Inservice on an RRT machine also known as Renal Replacement Therapy. A technology specialist came in and showed the ICU team how to operate and troubleshoot the machine. Another example would be the classes provided by the Epic team at Kaiser Permanente. According to Epic, more than 280 million patients have a current electronic health record with Epic (Epic, 2023). The IT Epic specialists show the nursing staff how to make the most of the charting system. Interactions between hospital staff and data and technology specialists would improve if the teaching and training happened in real time. Specialists coming on the units during patient care and providing on the job training will ensure the use of these innovative technologies such as devices and equipment are being used properly yielding the correct data improving patient care outcomes. If we wish to continue to propel the world of health care forward, nurses must apply the knowledge they have gained through education, research, and practice in an ethical manner (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2022). The same can be said regarding nursing informatics, the continued positive impact of innovative data and technology will only advance the health care field and provide improved professional interactions. Submission and Grading Information Grading Criteria To access your rubric: Week 3 Discussion Rubric Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 3 To participate in this Discussion: Week 3 Discussion Module 2: The Role of the Informatics Specialist in Healthcare (Weeks 3-4) Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Nurse Informaticist [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Learning Objectives Students will: Analyze interactions between nurse informaticists, data/technology specialists, and other professionals in healthcare organizations Recommend strategies to improve interactions between nurse informaticists and other professionals Analyze how nursing informatics as a specialty and new technologies impact interactions between nurse informaticists and members of healthcare teams Recommend nursing informatics projects to improve outcomes or efficiencies in healthcare organizations Identify stakeholders impacted by nursing informatics projects Analyze how nursing informatics projects improve outcomes or efficiencies in healthcare organizations Identify technologies required for implementation of nursing informatics projects Analyze the role of the nurse informaticist in nursing informatics project teams Due By Assignment Week 3, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources. Compose your initial Discussion post. Week 3, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post. Begin to compose your Assignment. Week 3, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts. Compose your peer Discussion responses. Continue to compose your Assignment. Week 3, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post). Week 3, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion. Deadline to submit your Assignment. Week 4, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment Week 4, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment Learning Resources Required Readings McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 525–535) Chapter 26, “Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 537–551) Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions: The Role of Executive Leadership. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(11), 543-548. Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018). Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology Initiatives: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 36(5), 209-213. Sipes, C. (2016). Project management: Essential skill of nurse informaticists. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256. Trying to get staff comfortable with a new system can be challenging, communication and education or training in this situation is critical to a successful transition.With proper comprehensive training prior to implementation and ensuring the staff of the benefits of using the new system before going live can alleviate some of the future impediments . One of the biggest problems faced by Informaticist while deploying a new EMR system is getting staff to learn how to they can use the System to its full capabilities. Staff members can discover methods to use outdated systems or to not efficiently use the new EHR system, even if a practice has “installed” one. When reluctant staff members choose to chart manually rather than electronically, it doubles the effort required because they must later enter the electronic record to chart what was written down. Increasing organizational efficiency is one rationale for putting in place a system like this, but when it’s not used correctly, it negates the objective and leads to double work. Getting employees to use the new System was one of our biggest challenges throughout implementation. The data that we are able to obtain through the electronic system can allow hospital systems to not only get a better picture of what is going on with the patients individually, but it also helps to see what is going on with the hospital and what improvements we can make on the administrative level to continually improve the hospital which will help improve overall care for the patient. References Kassam, I., Nagle, L., & Strudwick, G. (2017). Informatics competencies for nurse leaders: Protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 7(12), e018855. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018855 Links to an external site. Medical quality management: Theory and practice (3rd ed., 2021). (2020). Springer. Tim Scott; Thomas Rundall; Thomas Vogt; John Hsu & . (2018). Implementing an electronic medical record system (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis. Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Content Name: NURS_5051_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric Grid View List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Main Posting Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6050 Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Main Post: Timeliness Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3. First Response Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Second Response Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Participation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_5051_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric
Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A
